Risk Factors Identification of Unsafe Acts in Deep Coal Mine Workers Based on Grounded Theory and HFACS

Abstract

The risk factors affecting workers' unsafe acts were comprehensively identified by Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) and grounded theory based on interview data and accident reports from deep coal mines. Firstly, we collected accident case and field interview data from deep coal mines issued by authoritative institutions. Then, the data were coded according to grounded theory to obtain relevant concepts and types. The HFACS model was used to classify the concepts and categories. Finally, the relationship between core and secondary categories was sorted out by applying a story plot. The results show that risk factors of unsafe acts of deep coal mine workers include environmental factors, organizational influence, unsafe supervision and unsafe state of miners, and the main manifestations of unsafe acts are errors and violations. Among them, the unsafe state of miners is the intermediate variable, and other factors indirectly affect risky actions of coal miners through unsafe sates. Resource management, organizational processes and failure to correct problems are the top three risk factors that occur more frequently in unsafe acts. The three most common types of unsafe act are unreasonable labor organization, failure to enforce rules, and inadequate technical specifications. By combining grounded theory and the HFACS framework to analyze data, risk factors for deep coal miners can be quickly identified, and more precise and comprehensive conceptual models of risk factors in unsafe acts of deep coal miners can be obtained.

Work accident reporting in coal mining, Indonesia: A systematic literature review

“…The dominant factors which cause unsafe act practices during work among others are management of company's resources, process in organization, and company's failure in solving issues in the workplace. In addition, some of the common practices of unsafe acts are inappropriate placement of employees or inappropriate workload given to employees, failure in reinforcing prevailing regulations, and work tools or equipment which do not meet required technical specifications (Yang et al, 2022).…”

Behind the Silence of the Professional Classroom in Universities: Formation of Cognition-Practice Separation among University Students—A Grounded Theory Study in China

“…The grounded theory approach requires researchers to continuously collect and analyze data and to continuously supplement and improve emerging concepts and categories [ 38 ]. When the newly collected data cannot be classified in new ways, this indicates that the theory has reached saturation [ 43 ]. After the first phase was completed, we organized the second phase of data collection and analysis to confirm whether new categories or concepts would be generated and found that new concepts and categories were indeed generated in the second phase, for which we organized the third phase.…”

Human factors analysis of coal mine gas accidents based on improved HFACS model

“…Numerous researchers in the field of coal mine research have applied the HFACS method to examine unsafe behaviors and human factors contributing to accidents. For example, Niu and Yan (2016) employed an enhanced HFACS model to conduct a gray correlation degree analysis of coal mine accident causation, while Yang, Yang, Wang, Zhu, and Qin (2022) investigated the identification of risk factors associated with unsafe behaviors among coal mine workers using the underlying theory and the depth of HFACS. Fa et al (2021) explored the hierarchical relationship between human and organizational elements in coal mine accidents by progressively modifying the HFACS‐coal mines framework.…”