2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Wound Complications After Direct Anterior Approach Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
56
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While modest, early functional benefit of the DAA THA may be real, this should be juxtaposed with recent literature which suggests that the approach is associated with increased peri-prosthetic fracture 35 , femoral loosening 11 , early revision rates 36 , and incisional wound healing problems 37,38 . Warth et al 16 evaluated internet promotion of minimally invasive TKA by AAHKS members in 2007, and found that only 8.4% of surgeon websites referenced this technique.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While modest, early functional benefit of the DAA THA may be real, this should be juxtaposed with recent literature which suggests that the approach is associated with increased peri-prosthetic fracture 35 , femoral loosening 11 , early revision rates 36 , and incisional wound healing problems 37,38 . Warth et al 16 evaluated internet promotion of minimally invasive TKA by AAHKS members in 2007, and found that only 8.4% of surgeon websites referenced this technique.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The relatively higher rate of wound complications in this series can be explained by the predominant utilization of the direct anterior approach in patients included in this study. Multiple studies have demonstrated increased rates of wound complication when comparing the direct anterior approach to other surgical approaches [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While recognizing deep infection or reoperation are straightforward in a chart review, minor wound complications such as superficial SSIs or wound dehiscence may be missed if documentation is lacking. Although we attempted to standardize these definitions using previously published criteria [20,41], there is potential for misclassification if documentation was not sufficient. Second, there is a potential for selection bias in patients treated with ciNPT, as most of these were treated more recently and may have benefited from other variables that changed with time (such as MRSA PCR nasal screening) but were not included in the statistical analysis due to sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%