2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for vertebral compression fracture after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: Long-term results of a prospective phase 2 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…31 In a previous study, we reported a relatively high rate of VCF: 35% of patients developed progressive or new VCF in that study. 32 However, this needs to be put into the context that almost one-fourth of the patients had VCF before SBRT. Additionally, fractures were asymptomatic in most patients, although 2 patients required stabilization surgery after SBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In a previous study, we reported a relatively high rate of VCF: 35% of patients developed progressive or new VCF in that study. 32 However, this needs to be put into the context that almost one-fourth of the patients had VCF before SBRT. Additionally, fractures were asymptomatic in most patients, although 2 patients required stabilization surgery after SBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, Mantel et al have recently identified frequency, clinical relevance, and risk factors for VCF after spine SBRT with long-term follow-up in 56 patients (61 lesions) within a prospective multicenter phase 2 study (NCT01594892). 37 Post-SBRT VCF developed in 21 lesions (34.4%): of these, 10 lesions (16.4%) showed a progressive VCF, while a new VCF occurred in 11 lesions (18.0%). If on the one hand, SBRT dose did not significantly correlate to VCF in the univariate analysis, receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that a relative involvement of !34.5% of the vertebral body best predicted a post-SBRT VCF with an area under the curve of 0.864, a sensitivity of 77.8%, and a specificity of 89.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…SBRT to spinal lesions frequently results in flare-up of pain (20-70%) before pain relief but shows higher local control rates than those achieved with EBRT [12,[14][15][16]. However, a major complication after SBRT is vertebral compression fracture (VCF), which may occur in up to 40% of patients, specifically in case of pre-existing sintering [17][18][19]. Albeit occurrence or progression of VCF after SBRT resulted in a low mean increase of pain, SBRT may further pose a risk of VCF in adjacent vertebrae [17,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a major complication after SBRT is vertebral compression fracture (VCF), which may occur in up to 40% of patients, specifically in case of pre-existing sintering [17][18][19]. Albeit occurrence or progression of VCF after SBRT resulted in a low mean increase of pain, SBRT may further pose a risk of VCF in adjacent vertebrae [17,20]. The inherent stabilization and restoration of the vertebral body by cement augmentation virtually eradicates the risk of VCF or further progression of VCF, especially for patients with pre-existing VCF which would have a high probability of progredient VCF after SBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%