2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for transition to first episode psychosis among individuals with ‘at-risk mental states’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
216
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
216
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it is self-report trait anhedonia measured in non-clinical individuals that has been shown in past studies to be predictive of the future development of psychiatric disorders. 2,7,[22][23][24][25] Thus, we are confident that the structural and the functional neural correlates of trait anhedonia reported in this study have an important clinical value for the identification of neural markers of vulnerability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, it is self-report trait anhedonia measured in non-clinical individuals that has been shown in past studies to be predictive of the future development of psychiatric disorders. 2,7,[22][23][24][25] Thus, we are confident that the structural and the functional neural correlates of trait anhedonia reported in this study have an important clinical value for the identification of neural markers of vulnerability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Previous research indicates that trait anhedonia might be the result of a basic neuropsychophysiological dysfunction and a trait marker for both SZ 2,7,22,23 and MDD. 24,25 Moreover, anhedonia could characterize a specific subform of SZ 26 and is a key symptom for the diagnostic of melancholia, a specific subtype of MDD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UHR criteria have been widely used (Cannon et al, 2008;McGlashan et al, 2007) with rates of psychosis onset ("transition" or "conversion") found to range between 8 to 54% within 1-2.5 years (Cannon et al, 2008;Cornblatt et al, 2003;Mason et al, 2004;Miller et al, 2002;Morrison et al, 2012;Ruhrmann et al, 2003;Ruhrmann et al, 2010;Yung et al, 2003). However, there is evidence of a decline in transition rates in more recent UHR cohorts with rates as low as 8-28% in one year (Amminger et al, 2010;Demjaha et al, 2012;Morrison et al, 2012;Simon and Umbricht;Velthorst et al, 2009;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of these individuals report distressing attenuated symptoms of perceptual disturbances and ideational anomalies [29][30][31]. Several studies report that a high proportion of those identified with an ARMS also fulfil the criteria for another Axis I mental health diagnosis, mostly relating to mood, anxiety and substance misuse [24,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%