“…Furthermore, these dosimetric characteristics of the 3D-CRT plans compared to the IMRT plans with steeper DVH lines and homogeneous PTV doses may be related to the increased differences in highdose parameters with increasing PTV. Regarding the clinical significance of the increased MLD and V5-30 in the IMRT plans, the mean (6.44 Gy, 3.88 Gy, and 5.48%) and maximum (10.82 Gy, 6.56 Gy, and 11.52%) values for the ipsilateral MLD, bilateral MLD, and bilateral V20 in the IMRT plans of all 31 tumors were within safe limits for symptomatic RP risk recommended by the HyTEC report and Liu et al 14,15 Together with these values within safe limits, our small differences between the two techniques in these parameters are unlikely to be related to clinically significant differences.…”