2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Rapid Glaucoma Disease Progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,24 The observed proportion of fast progressors in our POAG cohort is also similar to previous studies: defined thresholds for ''fast'' or ''rapid'' progression in published literature range from > _1 to 2 dB/ year loss in MD, and reported prevalence of patients progressing rapidly varies between 3% and 17% in previous studies. [24][25][26][27][28][29] The main strength of our study is the large starting sample size compared to others in the literature. Although only 205 uveitic eyes were included in our final VF progression analysis, a sufficiently large starting sample was required to reach the final 205 included samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…13,24 The observed proportion of fast progressors in our POAG cohort is also similar to previous studies: defined thresholds for ''fast'' or ''rapid'' progression in published literature range from > _1 to 2 dB/ year loss in MD, and reported prevalence of patients progressing rapidly varies between 3% and 17% in previous studies. [24][25][26][27][28][29] The main strength of our study is the large starting sample size compared to others in the literature. Although only 205 uveitic eyes were included in our final VF progression analysis, a sufficiently large starting sample was required to reach the final 205 included samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…42 Although DH was a significant factor associated with rapid RNFL thinning in the conventional regression analysis, it was not presented as a prognostic factor in the regression tree model. DH is a known strong risk factor for glaucoma progression 13,43,44 and may indicate ongoing glaucomatous damage. [45][46][47] It is possible that that some DH was left undetected between the follow-ups by paucity of optic disc examinations, which have weakened the influence of DH on the rate of RNFL thinning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open‐angle glaucoma accounts for approximately 80% of all the glaucoma cases seen in the United States . The risk factors for developing visual field defects attributed to open‐angle glaucoma are multifactorial, they include age, larger vertical or horizontal cup‐disc ratio, higher IOP, thinner central corneal thickness, gender, and cardiovascular disease . Although elevated IOP is a risk factor for glaucoma, patients with normal IOP can also present with glaucoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%