2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11678-019-0535-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for loosening of cemented glenoid components in anatomical shoulder arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical importance of preserving the glenoid subchondral plate has been previously described in the literature. 6 , 20 , 25 This aims to ensure glenoid component stability and minimize the risk of loosening. Frich et al demonstrated that by reaming 1 mm below the subchondral plate, the average strength decreased by 25%, while reaming 2 mm reduced the strength by 70%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The critical importance of preserving the glenoid subchondral plate has been previously described in the literature. 6 , 20 , 25 This aims to ensure glenoid component stability and minimize the risk of loosening. Frich et al demonstrated that by reaming 1 mm below the subchondral plate, the average strength decreased by 25%, while reaming 2 mm reduced the strength by 70%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 Furthermore, Raiss et al reported that removing the subchondral plate increased the risk of loosening by 3.7 times. 20 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%