2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Lacunar Strokes with Visible Cerebral Lesions on Computed Tomography Scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified clinical factors associated with presence of a new lacunar lesion on follow-up CT including higher systolic blood pressure in the whole study population, NIHSS score <7, and higher blood glucose in the LACS subgroup. Similar to our results, previous studies identified systolic blood pressure as variably associated with subsequent lacunar infarction, 19,20 and diabetes mellitus but not baseline blood glucose was also associated with lacunar infarction. 21 Among radiological factors, preexisting lacunes were associated with a new lacunar infarction both in LACS and non-LACS populations.…”
Section: Strokesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We identified clinical factors associated with presence of a new lacunar lesion on follow-up CT including higher systolic blood pressure in the whole study population, NIHSS score <7, and higher blood glucose in the LACS subgroup. Similar to our results, previous studies identified systolic blood pressure as variably associated with subsequent lacunar infarction, 19,20 and diabetes mellitus but not baseline blood glucose was also associated with lacunar infarction. 21 Among radiological factors, preexisting lacunes were associated with a new lacunar infarction both in LACS and non-LACS populations.…”
Section: Strokesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These factors also affect the 3 primary measures incorporated into the present review and meta‐analyses. 137 , 163 , 231 , 232 , 233 Although blood pressure or hypertension may be a confounding factor, many studies adjusted for this. However, it is worth noting that we did not have any randomized‐controlled trials in our meta‐analyses, which may partly explain discrepancies regarding the impact of hypertension on cSVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%