2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00178.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for intraoperative portal vein thrombosis in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

Abstract: Pathologic changes of the recipient native portal venous system may cause thrombosis of the portal vein, especially in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study assessed the utility of Doppler ultrasound (US) for the detection of intraoperative portal vein occlusion and identification of predisposing risk factors in the recipients. Seventy-three pediatric recipients who underwent LDLT at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from 1994 to 2002 were included. Preoperative and intraoperative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It occurs during the follow‐up period, and the patients commonly present with ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hypersplenism (an enlarged spleen and a low platelet count). There are technical aspects related to the portal reconstruction per se that can increase the incidence of thrombosis: short vascular stumps in LDLT (anastomoses under tension), a size discrepancy between the donor and recipient vascular structures, anastomotic misalignment, stenosis, anastomotic kinks, a low portal flow (<7 cm/s), a small PV (<4 mm), and the use of interposition VGs . PVCs can also be secondary to other technical problems: venous outflow obstructions (increased resistance in the liver), graft compression, pretransplant thrombosis, high hematocrit, high hepatic arterial flow, prior splenectomy, and portosystemic shunts (decreased portal flow) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It occurs during the follow‐up period, and the patients commonly present with ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, and hypersplenism (an enlarged spleen and a low platelet count). There are technical aspects related to the portal reconstruction per se that can increase the incidence of thrombosis: short vascular stumps in LDLT (anastomoses under tension), a size discrepancy between the donor and recipient vascular structures, anastomotic misalignment, stenosis, anastomotic kinks, a low portal flow (<7 cm/s), a small PV (<4 mm), and the use of interposition VGs . PVCs can also be secondary to other technical problems: venous outflow obstructions (increased resistance in the liver), graft compression, pretransplant thrombosis, high hematocrit, high hepatic arterial flow, prior splenectomy, and portosystemic shunts (decreased portal flow) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new technical challenge came up after LDLT became an option: the use of large‐for‐size left lateral segment grafts in small children or infants may result in serious hemodynamic problems, including hepatic outflow obstruction, portal vein thrombosis (PVT), poor perfusion of the graft (as a result of compression and/or low portal flow) leading to graft dysfunction or nonfunction, difficulty in abdominal wound closure, and ventilatory problems 3, 4. Children <1 year of age, with 10 kg or less of body weight, low portal flow (≤7 cm/s), small portal venous size (≤4 mm), and GRWR >3% are strongly associated with PVT 5…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have described the techniques for PV reconstruction in pediatric LDLT . The technical issues are related to the use of short vascular stumps in LDLT, size discrepancies between the donor and recipient vascular structures, anastomotic misalignment, stenosis, anastomotic kink, low portal flow (<7 cm/s) and small PV (<4 mm) . Ueda et al , in the largest series of pediatric LDLT, reported focusing on PV reconstruction and complications (521 patients), showed that most of the reconstructions were performed in the PV trunk/branch patch (54%) or with the use of interposition vascular grafts (29%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%