2019
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1688323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for infections and secondary malignancies in patients with a myeloproliferative neoplasm treated with ruxolitinib: a dual-center, propensity score-matched analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Susceptibility to opportunistic infections in patients under ruxolitinib therapy has already been documented, with many reports of mycobacterial and viral infections. [3][4][5] Recent data also warn of a possible increased risk of developing aggressive lymphomas with JAK inhibitors, with a delay of several months between the initiation of JAK inhibitor and the diagnosis of lymphoma, 6 which is consistent with our case and assumes a role of ruxolitinibinduced immune suppression in the pathogenesis of these lymphomas. Reactive lymphocytosis secondary to EBV reactivation in a patient under ruxolitinib has been described elsewhere, 7 and one of the aggressive lymphomas described in patients under ruxolitinib was positive for EBV 6 , but no CHL-like EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder has been described in patients under ruxolitinib.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Susceptibility to opportunistic infections in patients under ruxolitinib therapy has already been documented, with many reports of mycobacterial and viral infections. [3][4][5] Recent data also warn of a possible increased risk of developing aggressive lymphomas with JAK inhibitors, with a delay of several months between the initiation of JAK inhibitor and the diagnosis of lymphoma, 6 which is consistent with our case and assumes a role of ruxolitinibinduced immune suppression in the pathogenesis of these lymphomas. Reactive lymphocytosis secondary to EBV reactivation in a patient under ruxolitinib has been described elsewhere, 7 and one of the aggressive lymphomas described in patients under ruxolitinib was positive for EBV 6 , but no CHL-like EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorder has been described in patients under ruxolitinib.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…14 The change in infectious rate is not always obvious. 15,16 We note that the incidence of herpes zoster infection is significantly increased in the rux group, while other infections are not. 2 Revealing the same outcome, a systematic review suggested a clinical relevance to the risk.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A propensity score weighted competing risk analysis revealed a statistically significant increased risk of second malignancy (HR 10.81 [95% CI 2.54-45.92], p=0.001) with ruxolitinib treatment. 23 However, such data should be interpreted with caution, because of the very low prevalence of secondary malignancy. Of note, the use of JAK1/2 inhibitor seems to be associated with a higher frequency of aggressive B-cell lymphomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%