2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for glenoid erosion in patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of 118 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To be noted also is that one-third of the patients in a recent study developed glenoid erosion 2.5 years after SHA, with a threefold risk for females with OA (Herschel et al. 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be noted also is that one-third of the patients in a recent study developed glenoid erosion 2.5 years after SHA, with a threefold risk for females with OA (Herschel et al. 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone marrow edema and loosening may specifically be observed at the inferior glenoid in case of anatomical or reversed arthroplasties. In case of isolated replacement of the humeral head (shoulder hemiarthroplasty; anatomical glenoid remains), glenoid osteoarthritis may be observed during follow‐up . In patients with shoulder instability, bone consolidation between the glenoid and the transferred coracoid process may be evaluated after the Latarjet procedure (Fig.…”
Section: Clinical Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were looking for the presence of cyst preoperatively. 21 Humeral erosion was also assessed in 4 grades: 1, none (greater tuberosity [GT] densification); 2, mild (GT erosion without humeral densification); 3, moderate (GT thinning); and 4, severe (spherical deformation reaching the lateral cortex or GT fracture). We measured the preoperative and postoperative thickness of the GT and researched the spherical GT deformation as well as humeral densification around the pyrocarbon implant ( Fig.…”
Section: Radiologic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%