2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for First Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Infection: Findings from a Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: Objective To quantify the extent to which revision(s) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt are associated with increased risk of CSF shunt infection, after adjusting for patient factors that may contribute to infection risk. Study design We used the HCRN registry to assemble a large prospective six center cohort of 1,036 children undergoing initial CSF shunt placement between April 2008 and January 2012. The primary outcome of interest was first CSF shunt infection. Data for initial CSF shunt placement and all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
74
7
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(39 reference statements)
8
74
7
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This in agreement with previous cohorts that report an infection rate of 6-8 % but lower than a recently published, large multicenter study that reported an infection rate of 11.7 % per patient [14]. The risk of developing a shunt infection is strongly correlated with increasing number of revision surgeries [15]. In our study, a treated VAD infection prior to shunt placement was not a risk factor for developing shunt infection in the future.…”
Section: Vad Infection Ratesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This in agreement with previous cohorts that report an infection rate of 6-8 % but lower than a recently published, large multicenter study that reported an infection rate of 11.7 % per patient [14]. The risk of developing a shunt infection is strongly correlated with increasing number of revision surgeries [15]. In our study, a treated VAD infection prior to shunt placement was not a risk factor for developing shunt infection in the future.…”
Section: Vad Infection Ratesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This failure rate appears to be driven by shunt malfunction rather than shunt infection as the endoscope was not significantly associated (OR 1.45 [0.97-2.13]) with shunt infection in a previous HCRN study. 18 Our study found that this harm was specific to the endoscope as the other surgical adjuncts used to direct the proximal catheters (ultrasound and frameless stereotaxy) were associated with neither CSF shunt failure nor a trend toward diminished shunt survival. Considering the evidence, we would not recommend the routine use of the endoscope for the insertion of a child's initial CSF shunt.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This is logical, as it appears a direct communication between the peritoneal cavity and the skin would confer increased risk of infection in ventriculoperitoneal shunts. 40 Unfortunately, neither our study nor theirs could collect data on the timing of GT placement compared with shunt insertion, so our understanding of that correlation is limited. Nabika et al, however, retrospectively assessed a small cohort of 23 adult patients in Hiroshima and concluded that there was an increased risk of infection when a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was placed within a month after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.…”
Section: Other Variables Associated With Shunt Infectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…40 They found that the presence of a GT resulted in a 2-fold increased risk of infection in their multivariate analysis. This is logical, as it appears a direct communication between the peritoneal cavity and the skin would confer increased risk of infection in ventriculoperitoneal shunts.…”
Section: Other Variables Associated With Shunt Infectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation