2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors for Cerebral Infarction After Microsurgical Clipping of Hunt-Hess Grade 0–2 Single Intracranial Aneurysm: A Retrospective Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with CA rupture and bleeding, if conventional conservative therapy is difficult to achieve a hemostatic effect, it is recommended to combine Hunt-Hess grading to decide whether to undergo surgery. Among them, grade I and II patients require immediate surgery, while > grade II patients need to decide whether to undergo surgery based on their condition after bleeding situation stabilizes, in order to minimize degree of damage caused by surgery to patients' body and brain tissue [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with CA rupture and bleeding, if conventional conservative therapy is difficult to achieve a hemostatic effect, it is recommended to combine Hunt-Hess grading to decide whether to undergo surgery. Among them, grade I and II patients require immediate surgery, while > grade II patients need to decide whether to undergo surgery based on their condition after bleeding situation stabilizes, in order to minimize degree of damage caused by surgery to patients' body and brain tissue [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, relevant predictive factors for postoperative Hunt–Hess grading in patients are lacking before the IA intervention. Currently, the assessment heavily relies on the clinical experience of healthcare provider to determine the extent of neurological impairment in patients following the procedure ( 8 ). However, the accuracy and objectivity of these assessments may be influenced by subjective factors, limiting the precision of patient prognosis evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%