2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for Campylobacter colonisation during rearing of broiler flocks in Great Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…were detected in 83% of carcasses in studies from the late 1990s (33,35) at slaughter ...........................................................................50.3 Sunshine hours during rearing.......................................................47.1 Temp at placement .........................................................................46.7 Sunshine hours during placement .................................................44.6 Sunshine hours at slaughter ...........................................................36.5 Yr of slaughter.................................................................................31.2 Rainfall at slaughter................................................................... The proportion of highly colonized flocks (ϳ30%) was lower than that found in a study from 2001 where 75% of positive batches were Campylobacter positive at Ͼ70% (10). This could reflect late infection, e.g., associated with better biosecurity during rearing (9,26), or slower spread of infection, e.g., related to treatment of drinking water (15). Most other studies have not tested several individual cecal samples within a batch for the presence of Campylobacter (5,7,18,44,53), but such data are useful for scientists designing risk assessment models to determine the most appropriate and effective intervention strategies to reduce Campylobacter prevalence in poultry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were detected in 83% of carcasses in studies from the late 1990s (33,35) at slaughter ...........................................................................50.3 Sunshine hours during rearing.......................................................47.1 Temp at placement .........................................................................46.7 Sunshine hours during placement .................................................44.6 Sunshine hours at slaughter ...........................................................36.5 Yr of slaughter.................................................................................31.2 Rainfall at slaughter................................................................... The proportion of highly colonized flocks (ϳ30%) was lower than that found in a study from 2001 where 75% of positive batches were Campylobacter positive at Ͼ70% (10). This could reflect late infection, e.g., associated with better biosecurity during rearing (9,26), or slower spread of infection, e.g., related to treatment of drinking water (15). Most other studies have not tested several individual cecal samples within a batch for the presence of Campylobacter (5,7,18,44,53), but such data are useful for scientists designing risk assessment models to determine the most appropriate and effective intervention strategies to reduce Campylobacter prevalence in poultry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campylobacter can be frequently found in surface water and is part of the natural intestinal microbiota of a wide range of wild and domestic animals, especially poultry (Newell 2002, Whyte et al 2004, Abulreesh et al 2006, Young et al 2007, Ogden et al 2009, Jokinen et al 2011. The estimated Campylobacter prevalence in poultry and nonpoultry farm animals depends on season, age of animal, flock or herd size and type, diet, husbandry practices, and geography, with C. jejuni being the most isolated species (Kuana et al 2008, McDowell et al 2008, Zweifel et al 2008, Ellis-Iversen et al 2009, Messens et al 2009, Nä ther et al 2009, EFSA 2010a, EFSA and ECDC 2011, Jorgensen et al 2011. In pigs C. coli, however, dominates (84% of the isolates in 2009) (EFSA and ECDC 2011).…”
Section: Campylobacter Prevalence In Animals and The Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proposed to reduce the risk of flock colonization and spread including chlorinated drinking water [17], 50 bacteriophage therapy [18] and bacteriocins [19] or the use of probiotics [20] and vaccination [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%