2014
DOI: 10.3109/09286586.2014.988874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors For and Progression of Myopia in Young Taiwanese Men

Abstract: Older age, parental myopia, higher educational level, close work, fewer outdoor activities, and higher urbanization level were associated with the prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese men.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were consistent with Saw's study 23 showing that students who read more than 2 h per day were more likely to be myopia, Ip's study 33 reporting that longer time spent on reading for pleasure was associated with a myopic refraction, and Saxena's study 26 illustrating that positive association of myopia was observed with children study/ reading more than 5 h per day, watching television more than 2 h per day, and playing computer/video games. In addition, although many previous studies revealed that the distance of near work was associated with myopia in children, some of these studies only consider the distance of close-up reading was an important risk factor for myopia, 33,34 and others regarded the distances of different near work activities as a composite variable (distance from near work) and roughly thought that a higher prevalence of myopia was associated with shorter near work distance. 7 In our study, the results first demonstrated that myopic children had a closer distance of reading or watching television than children without myopia, and the final models demonstrated that both male and female students whose distance of reading longer than 25 cm were less likely to have myopia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were consistent with Saw's study 23 showing that students who read more than 2 h per day were more likely to be myopia, Ip's study 33 reporting that longer time spent on reading for pleasure was associated with a myopic refraction, and Saxena's study 26 illustrating that positive association of myopia was observed with children study/ reading more than 5 h per day, watching television more than 2 h per day, and playing computer/video games. In addition, although many previous studies revealed that the distance of near work was associated with myopia in children, some of these studies only consider the distance of close-up reading was an important risk factor for myopia, 33,34 and others regarded the distances of different near work activities as a composite variable (distance from near work) and roughly thought that a higher prevalence of myopia was associated with shorter near work distance. 7 In our study, the results first demonstrated that myopic children had a closer distance of reading or watching television than children without myopia, and the final models demonstrated that both male and female students whose distance of reading longer than 25 cm were less likely to have myopia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] In the urban areas of East Asia, myopia affects more than 80% of schoolchildren and young adults. [4][5][6][7][8] Although refractive error problems are usually correctable, myopia is still a major public health issue worldwide. Visual impairment can be caused by uncorrected or undercorrected refractive error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncorrected refractive error is a common cause of vision impairment in children,2 with myopia being the most frequently seen refractive error, especially in East and Southeast Asian countries,3 such as Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and parts of mainland China 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. Elsewhere in the world as in North America, Australia, Europe and Middle East, the prevalence of myopia is also on the rise but at a slower pace 16, 17, 18, 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%