2018
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1493453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors for abnormally invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: A prior CS and placenta previa are among the strongest risk factors for the occurrence of AIP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(6 reference statements)
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of accreta continued to rise with increasing previous cesarean deliveries, up to 6.74% for women with previous cesarean deliveries compared with no previous CD, with an odds ratio of 29.8 (11). Compared with previous normal spontaneous vaginal delivery, previous cesarian delivery was a significant risk factor for placenta previa in many studies (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The highest number of previous cesarean delivery in our study was four.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…The incidence of accreta continued to rise with increasing previous cesarean deliveries, up to 6.74% for women with previous cesarean deliveries compared with no previous CD, with an odds ratio of 29.8 (11). Compared with previous normal spontaneous vaginal delivery, previous cesarian delivery was a significant risk factor for placenta previa in many studies (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The highest number of previous cesarean delivery in our study was four.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Each examiner was asked to judge the following features (Appendix S1, Figure 1): (1) presence of a PAS disorder; (2) depth of placental invasion (placenta accreta, increta or percreta); (3) topography of placental invasion in the sagittal plane (posterior upper bladder wall and uterine body, posterior lower bladder wall and lower uterine segment and cervix or no visible bladder invasion); (4) presence of parametrial invasion in the axial and coronal planes; (5) presence and number of newly formed vessels in the parametrial tissue, evaluated in the axial plane; (6) location of the placenta (anterior, posterior, lateral or fundal); (7) presence and type of placenta previa (the placenta was defined as 'placenta previa' when it was lying directly over the internal os and as 'low-lying' (16) presence of artifacts. The reference standard was the presence of a PAS disorder confirmed on histopathological assessment or, in the most severe types of invasion, on surgical evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound is usually the primary imaging tool for assessing women at risk for a PAS disorder, such as those presenting with placenta previa and prior Cesarean delivery (CD) or uterine surgery, while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed to confirm the ultrasound diagnosis and delineate the depth and topography of placental invasion, which can significantly affect maternal outcome and influence the surgical approach [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of accreta continued to rise with increasing previous cesarean deliveries, up to 6.74% for women with previous cesarean deliveries compared with no previous CD, with an odds ratio (OR) of 29.8 (11). Compared with previous normal spontaneous vaginal delivery, previous cesarian delivery was a significant risk factor for placenta previa in many studies (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The highest number of previous cesarean delivery in our study was four.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%