2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors associated with the within-farm transmission of bovine viral diarrhea virus and the incidence of persistently infected cattle on dairy farms from Ibaraki prefecture of Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the most common way of BVDV transmission was reported as the movement of PI cattle between herds [ 27 ], which was attributed to at least some cases in Switzerland [ 28 ]. In a prefecture in Honshu, Japan, the PI cattle occurrence was also proportionally reported to correlate with the rate of cattle purchased [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the most common way of BVDV transmission was reported as the movement of PI cattle between herds [ 27 ], which was attributed to at least some cases in Switzerland [ 28 ]. In a prefecture in Honshu, Japan, the PI cattle occurrence was also proportionally reported to correlate with the rate of cattle purchased [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that BVDV can be introduced from common pastures and maintained within a farm. It is also considered that some cattle were transiently infected with BVDV in a common pasture, and they then gave birth to PI cattle via transplacental infection, thus leading to the generation of PI cattle and further spread of BVDV after the return to their original farms [ 29 , 33 ]. All of the PI cattle, except one in this study, were neither moved into nor moved out of the common pasture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of BVD, Trojan cows are a major cause, in addition to PI animals, for BVDV spread into hitherto unaffected holdings [11][12][13][14]29] and represent a particular challenge when controlling BVDV. In such cases, the problem only becomes visible after the birth of the PI calf, which might be several months after the purchase of the pregnant dam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fetal infection may, depending on the phase of gestation, result in abortion, stillbirth, congenital abnormalities, or, when the infection occurs during the first trimester, the birth of immunotolerant, persistently infected, viremic calves [8][9][10]. Persistently infected (PI) calves shed enormous amounts of BVDV throughout their lives, making them a major source for the spread and perpetuation of BVDV within individual cattle herds and transmission to BVDV-free holdings [11][12][13][14]. Therefore, PI calves are the main target of BVD control programs that have been implemented in several countries [13,[15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported number of EBL cases has increased more than those of the JD and The number of BVD cases has also slightly increased in recent years (Figure 2). More than 300 PI cattle per year have been identified since 2015 due to aggressive surveillance, such as the bulk tank milk test, examinations of newborn calves, and regional surveillance (3,4). Aggressive surveillance may identify BVD and EBL cases without clinical signs.…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%