2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04212-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors associated with the stability of mini-implants and mini-plates: systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly associated risk factors with the failure of mini plates were age, viability of the implantation site, and soft tissue characteristics (21). Additionally, the instability of the mini-plates used in skeletal anchorage was found to be higher in isolated mini-implants positioned in the mandibular region (22). The development of granulation tissue and a higher rate of inflammation were reported in the mini plate insertion cases; however, the difference was not statistically significant when compared with the mini screw cases (23).…”
Section: Mini Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly associated risk factors with the failure of mini plates were age, viability of the implantation site, and soft tissue characteristics (21). Additionally, the instability of the mini-plates used in skeletal anchorage was found to be higher in isolated mini-implants positioned in the mandibular region (22). The development of granulation tissue and a higher rate of inflammation were reported in the mini plate insertion cases; however, the difference was not statistically significant when compared with the mini screw cases (23).…”
Section: Mini Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially limited to clinical conditions in which high anchorage requirements were essential for the maximum retraction of the anterior teeth, the application to a wide range of complex three-dimensional tooth movements-including intrusion, extrusion, distalization, expansion, and protractionhas been envisioned, with a very high success rate achieved-above 80-90% [6,7]. This notwithstanding, differences in the success rates seem to occur in relation to the location of insertion, with mandibular placement presenting an increased risk of failure as compared to placement in the maxilla, as well as the option of inter-radicular placements in comparison to extra-alveolar locations, such as palatal placement [8][9][10]. Mini-implants further offer the benefits of a relatively low cost, placement in a single chairside procedure, better patient compliance, and the possibility for immediate loading, as osseointegration is not a requirement for effective functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative materials and technologies to improve implants primary stability are an intense research topic in dentistry [6]. The use of skeletal anchorage has been the subject of above 1500 scientific papers published in the recent two decades [7], and manufacturers provide more and more innovative solutions. As a result, multiple systematic reviews regarding the influence of OMIs geometry on treatment success rate can be found, generalizing and assessing multiple factors [7][8][9][10][11] and thematically specific [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of skeletal anchorage has been the subject of above 1500 scientific papers published in the recent two decades [7], and manufacturers provide more and more innovative solutions. As a result, multiple systematic reviews regarding the influence of OMIs geometry on treatment success rate can be found, generalizing and assessing multiple factors [7][8][9][10][11] and thematically specific [12,13]. Clinical guidelines can be found in the literature referring to the influence of macrodesign of OMIs on success rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation