2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-3060-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors associated with non-union after triple pelvic osteotomy (Toennis and Kalchschmidt technique): a case–control study and review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This increased stability may also avoid possible non-union of osteotomy sites in TPO previously reported in several studies. [25,26] Ischial and pubic osteotomy site non-unions are hard to manage and we had no non-unions in our study group, neither at iliac bone nor ischium/pubic bone, also with the possible contribution of the young mean age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This increased stability may also avoid possible non-union of osteotomy sites in TPO previously reported in several studies. [25,26] Ischial and pubic osteotomy site non-unions are hard to manage and we had no non-unions in our study group, neither at iliac bone nor ischium/pubic bone, also with the possible contribution of the young mean age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the current literature, there is rather little scientific evidence about the risk factors affecting the bone healing process after TPO. Yilmaz et al conducted a retrospective case–control study, comparing 53 patients suffering from a non-union with 117 patients who did not experience non-union [ 15 ]. These cases were identified out of a total of 3269 patients who had undergone TPO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this examination focused on the dynamics of the acetabular fragment in the first 12 weeks after TPO, leaving the further clinical course outside. Hence, an impact on the clinical outcome or on the healing of the osteotomy sites cannot be foreseen [ 19 24 ]. Third, the predominately used pattern of acetabular fragment fixation (see above) had to be modified in some cases, e.g., when a crossing of the 4.5 mm steel screws in a thin iliac bone was not feasible without a collision of the implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%