Risk factors associated with mortality of COVID-19 in 3125 counties of the United States

Abstract

Background The number of cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States has risen sharply since March 2020. A county health ranking and roadmaps program has been established to identify factors associated with disparity in mobility and mortality of COVID-19 in all counties in the United States. The risk factors associated with county-level mortality of COVID-19 with various levels of prevalence are not well understood. Methods Using the data obtained from the County Health Rankings and Roadmaps program, this study applied a negative binomial design to the county-level mortality counts of COVID-19 as of August 27, 2020 in the United States. In this design, the infected counties were categorized into three levels of infections using clustering analysis based on time-varying cumulative confirmed cases from March 1 to August 27, 2020. COVID-19 patients were not analyzed individually but were aggregated at the county-level, where the county-level deaths of COVID-19 confirmed by the local health agencies. Clustering analysis and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used in our statistical analysis. Results A total of 3125 infected counties were assigned into three classes corresponding to low, median, and high prevalence levels of infection. Several risk factors were significantly associated with the mortality counts of COVID-19, where higher level of air pollution (0.153, P < 0.001) increased the mortality in the low prevalence counties and elder individuals were more vulnerable in both the median (0.049, P < 0.001) and high (0.114, P < 0.001) prevalence counties. The segregation between non-Whites and Whites (low: 0.015, P < 0.001; median:0.025, P < 0.001; high: 0.019, P = 0.005) and higher Hispanic population (low and median: 0.020, P < 0.001; high: 0.014, P = 0.009) had higher likelihood of risk of the deaths in all infected counties. Conclusions The mortality of COVID-19 depended on sex, race/ethnicity, and outdoor environment. The increasing awareness of the impact of these significant factors may help decision makers, the public health officials, and the general public better control the risk of pandemic, particularly in the reduction in the mortality of COVID-19. Graphic abstract

Attitudes toward Vaccination against COVID-19 in Poland. A Longitudinal Study Performed before and Two Months after the Commencement of the Population Vaccination Programme in Poland

“…According to this study, women manifest more favourable attitudes toward vaccination against COVID-19 than men. The above corresponds to current statistics regarding vaccination in Poland, according to which 65% of the vaccinated persons are women [26], however, the discussed results contradict the world reports that show that men are more enthusiastic toward vaccination than women [27]. The situation does not seem very different in the case of elderly people, persons with a higher level of education and those living in large cities.…”

High health expenditures and low exposure of population to air pollution as critical factors that can reduce fatality rate in COVID-19 pandemic crisis: a global analysis

“…Manifold studies focus on different aspects of COVID-19 pandemic crisis (cf., Hu et al, 2021 ; Tian et al, 2021 ). Asirvatham et al (2020) estimate an adjusted case fatality rate of COVID-19 in India considering some factors of urban environment and population.…”

The Relationship between Cognitive Function, Lifestyle Behaviours and Perception of Stress during the COVID-19 Induced Confinement: Insights from Correlational and Mediation Analyses

“…The clinical impact is likely to be greater when individuals or their families have health problems that are also some of the risk factors for developing SARS-CoV-2 infection (e.g., being overweight or obese, smoking history, suffering from chronic-degenerative disorders or other underlying co-morbidities, such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, among others) [13][14][15]. Furthermore, time spent thinking about the pandemic, media exposure, the consumption of misleading news, and misinformation are also aggravating factors that exacerbate psychological distress.…”