2015
DOI: 10.11648/j.jgo.20150306.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors Associated with Group B Streptococcus Colonization and Their Effect on Pregnancy Outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result is also similar with various studies conducted in different parts of the world that ranged from 20.9% in Ethiopia, Zimbabwe and Palestine [3, 20, 21] to 28.7% in Poland [22]. However, it is lower than a report South Africa (48.2%) [6]. Our study showed higher prevalence of maternal colonization with GBS than the adjusted worldwide estimates of colonization (18%) with lower prevalence in sub-regions like Southern Asia (12.5% and Eastern Asia (11%) [4]; in India, 2.3% [7] and 20% in Democratic Republic of the Congo [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our result is also similar with various studies conducted in different parts of the world that ranged from 20.9% in Ethiopia, Zimbabwe and Palestine [3, 20, 21] to 28.7% in Poland [22]. However, it is lower than a report South Africa (48.2%) [6]. Our study showed higher prevalence of maternal colonization with GBS than the adjusted worldwide estimates of colonization (18%) with lower prevalence in sub-regions like Southern Asia (12.5% and Eastern Asia (11%) [4]; in India, 2.3% [7] and 20% in Democratic Republic of the Congo [23].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A review of 390 articles from 85 countries with a total of 299,924 pregnant women showed that the adjusted estimate for maternal GBS colonization worldwide was 18% with regional variation like lower prevalence in Southern Asia (12.5% and Eastern Asia 11%) [4]. The maternal colonization prevalence among the African studies was also reported as 12% in Kenya [5] to 48.2% in South Africa [6]. It is ranged from 2.3% in India [7] to 40.8% in Italy [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because vaginal GBS colonization results in ascending infection and inflammation, chorioamnionitis and preterm PROM and finally preterm delivery. 5 This is in agreement with a study from Jimma, Ethiopia, 5 South Africa 16 and India. 15 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was consistent with the estimated adjusted global prevalence of maternal GBS colonization (18%) 30 and previous reports from Africa (15.7–23.6%), 22–24 , 31 , 38 , 39 Jordan (19.5%) 14 and the USA (21.6%). 40 However, it was lower in comparison to reports from South Africa (48.2%), 16 Gambia (33.7%), 41 the United Kingdom (29.4%) 42 and USA (35%). 12 But the present finding is higher compared to the 7.2 −13.7% prior reports from other parts of Ethiopia, 18 , 25 , 43 , 44 and 6.1% in China.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation