2021
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors and predictors for tumor site origin in metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model features in the study contained five variables: age, lung metastasis, liver metastasis, radiation, and chemotherapy. These variables were also proved to be associated with survival outcome among CUP patients in other studies (20,23). Furthermore, a recent study showed that gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, number of metastatic sites, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were independent prognostic factors for survival among CUP patients (20).…”
Section: Model Featuresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The model features in the study contained five variables: age, lung metastasis, liver metastasis, radiation, and chemotherapy. These variables were also proved to be associated with survival outcome among CUP patients in other studies (20,23). Furthermore, a recent study showed that gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, number of metastatic sites, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were independent prognostic factors for survival among CUP patients (20).…”
Section: Model Featuresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Histopathologically, the gallbladder tumor was diagnosed as a benign hyperplastic polyp. Based on the results of immunochemical staining, the liver tumor was diagnosed as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, highly suspected of liver metastases from the stomach, duodenum or small intestine (10,22,23). However, postoperative whole-body PET/CT and small intestine fluoroscopy showed no suspicious primary lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver tumors were positive for CK20, CD10 and MUC5AC and negative for CK7, hepatocyte, PSA, CDK2 and CEA (Figure 2D). This immune phenotype suggested the liver tumors were poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma that originated from the stomach, duodenum or small intestine (10,22,23).…”
Section: Preoperative Diagnostic Images Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (Ct) Coronal Images In the Portal Venous Phase Showing The mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations