2021
DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.21.11583-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors and outcomes of prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time in surgery for adult congenital heart disease: a single-center study from a low-middle-income country

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid approach allowed for shorter CPB bypass time (187 minutes) versus average CPB for total aortic arch replacement of 241 minutes 6 . A shorter CPB is associated with longer duration of ventilation, longer CVICU stay, and longer overall hospital stay 7 . Additionally, given this hybrid approach, the patient did not require total aortic cross clamp or circulatory arrest.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The hybrid approach allowed for shorter CPB bypass time (187 minutes) versus average CPB for total aortic arch replacement of 241 minutes 6 . A shorter CPB is associated with longer duration of ventilation, longer CVICU stay, and longer overall hospital stay 7 . Additionally, given this hybrid approach, the patient did not require total aortic cross clamp or circulatory arrest.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…RAT-MIAVR often requires a longer period for the body to regain its normal temperature after ACC, due to the use of peripheral cannulation to facilitate CPB. Prolonged CPB time during AVR could lead to challenging complications [ 11 , 12 ] . Although prolonged CPB, ACC, and total operative time were significant in our RATMIAVR group, we still did not observe any significant prolongation in mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit time, and total hospitalization time between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous data have demonstrated that CPB time is associated with worsening morbidity and mortality and poor clinical outcome. 13 , 14 Preemptive peripheral cannulation certainly cannot prevent critical cardiac injury during sternal reentry. 14 As a result, only patients with complex and extremely high-risk anatomy and expected injury should be cannulated preemptively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%