1993
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970130307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk evaluation of CVS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss rate observed in this study is lower than the average loss rate of about 4% cited for CVS. 8 We did not observe any relationship between the loss rate and type of procedure (TA vs. TC). The authors have observed that the learning curve for each individual physician was different, given the same use of ultrasound instrumentation, ultrasound technician, and the same training protocol for CVS sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loss rate observed in this study is lower than the average loss rate of about 4% cited for CVS. 8 We did not observe any relationship between the loss rate and type of procedure (TA vs. TC). The authors have observed that the learning curve for each individual physician was different, given the same use of ultrasound instrumentation, ultrasound technician, and the same training protocol for CVS sampling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…3 Contradictory findings of limb reduction associated with CVS have also been reported. [6][7][8][9] Based on the current data, it has been determined that CVS performed after 10 weeks of gestation, in the first trimester, is a safe, accurate and reliable prenatal test for detecting cytogenetic abnormalities. 10 In the present study, we report our experience of 1000 CVS procedures performed in an operator-controlled clinical and laboratory setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blant annet forekommer kromosommosaikk noe hyppigere ved chorionbiopsi (ca. 1%) (8,9). Dette representerer ikke nødvendigvis kromosommønsteret hos fosteret, og det endelige svaret må avklares gjennom fornyet undersøkelse med amniocentese.…”
Section: Chorionbiopsierunclassified
“…International wird mit einer Hintergrundabortusrate von 3% und mit einer Zunahme der Fehlgebur ten nach Amniozentese um 0,5-1% gerechnet [19][20][21]. Bei Chorion biopsien wird das Abortusrisiko um 0,5-4,4% höher angegeben als bei Amniozentesen [20,[22][23][24][25] …”
Section: Introductionunclassified