2000
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580212.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk estimates for carriers of chromosome reciprocal translocation t(4;9)(p15.2;p13)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,16 Our observation confirms two previous suggestions of Saito et al 37 and Nicoulaz et al 35 that 1p36 region for pure distal terminal deletions, 411 Mb is the haplolethal. Although many large 1p36 deletions~10-11 Mb in size are likely nonlethal, 39,[42][43][44] additional observations are necessary to determine if monosomy 1p36-pter sized 411 Mb is risk factor for limited survival rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,16 Our observation confirms two previous suggestions of Saito et al 37 and Nicoulaz et al 35 that 1p36 region for pure distal terminal deletions, 411 Mb is the haplolethal. Although many large 1p36 deletions~10-11 Mb in size are likely nonlethal, 39,[42][43][44] additional observations are necessary to determine if monosomy 1p36-pter sized 411 Mb is risk factor for limited survival rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…1,2 The collection of relatively numerous empirical and cytogenetic data of individual RCT carrier pedigrees is necessary to ascertain the risks of malsegregation associated with particular translocations. [5][6][7][8][9] Because the risk of malsegregation is dependent on the size and chromosomal origins of the segments involved and placement of the break points, the accuracy of identifying the break point positions for particular RCT is crucial. High-resolution molecular cytogenetic techniques, like metaphase, interphase and fiber fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), sequence-tagged site (STS) marker walking and sequencing of chromosomal regions containing the rearrangement break points and junctions, may be useful for better characterization of specific rearrangements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terminal part of chromosome 19 is known as a gene density region [ 30 ]. Our data confirm the general rule saying that the probability rate for viable unbalanced child from carriers of a double segment imbalance is generally lower compared to the rates for carriers of a single segment imbalance [ 18 , 31 ]. That is because the other forms of imbalance presumably lead to miscarriages.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Probability rates obtained for families with RCT at risk of single‐segment imbalance may be useful for families of RCT carriers at risk of double‐segment imbalances in case of families with relatively small number of members, as it has been shown previously (2, 4, 5) and re‐evaluated by us (33). It is based on comparison of two probability rates for each segment imbalance obtained independently from families at risk of single‐segment imbalance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%