Risk comprehensive evaluation of urban network planning based on fuzzy Bayesian LS_SVM

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to use artificial intelligence to evaluate the risks of urban power network planning.Design/methodology/approachA fuzzy Bayesian least squares support vector machine (LS_SVM) model is established in this paper, which can learn the risk information of urban power network planning through artificial intelligence and acquire expert knowledge for its risk evaluation. With the advantage of possessing learning analog simulation precision and speed, the proposed model can be effectively applied in conducting a risk evaluation of an urban network planning system. First, fuzzy theory is applied to quantify qualitative risk factors of the planning to determine the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation value of the risk factors. Then, Bayesian evidence framework is utilized in LS_SVM model parameter optimization to automatically adjust the LS_SVM regularization parameters and nuclear parameters to obtain the best parameter values. Based on this, a risk comprehensive evaluation of urban network planning based on artificial intelligence is established.FindingsThe fuzzy Bayesian LS_SVM model established in this paper is an effective artificial intelligence method for risk comprehensive evaluation in urban network planning through empirical study.Originality/valueThe paper breaks new ground in using artificial intelligence to evaluate urban power network planning risks.

Highway Microgrid Project Evaluation under Energy Transportation Integration

“…Zeng et al [19] built a multi-stage evaluation index system and proposed an evaluation model combining equilibrium analysis and principal component analysis to achieve the objective evaluation of correlation index information. Based on the fuzzy membership degree hypothesis, He et al [20] quantifies the risk situation of each stage in the life cycle of the urban power grid, and gives the comprehensive quantitative scores of various risks. However, in the above study, the subjective weighting method shows the subjective opinion and intuition of a specialist, which is arbitrary.…”

Hierarchical Structure Model of Safety Risk Factors in New Coastal Towns: A Systematic Analysis Using the DEMATEL-ISM-SNA Method

“…Previous research conducted resilience arrangements analysis to establish different risk responses [ 7 , 8 ]. Researchers applied some approaches to risk management (e.g., Social Network Analysis (SNA) [ 9 ], Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) [ 10 ], Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) [ 11 ], Bayesian belief network [ 12 ]). Such approaches still fail to address the problem systematically due to their shortcomings and advantages [ 13 ].…”