The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk communication in South Korea: Social acceptance of nuclear power plants (NPPs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the reasons for patients' risk perception, treatment outcome and insufficient communication were the primary reasons in the present study, which is consistent with previous studies (Song, Kim, & Han, 2013; Xie, Li, Chen, & Cui, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding the reasons for patients' risk perception, treatment outcome and insufficient communication were the primary reasons in the present study, which is consistent with previous studies (Song, Kim, & Han, 2013; Xie, Li, Chen, & Cui, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies also addressed benefit perception of NPP in that way (e.g. [ 13 14 , 47 48 ]). In fact the feelings of personal benefits are the measuring target, which is involved in people’s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For benefit perception, previous studies focus mainly on the contribution of NPPs in supplying power [ 13 , 14 ], getting cheaper energy [ 13 , 14 , 47 ], or regulating climate [ 14 , 48 ]. In China, during power shortage the government might increase electricity price or make resident’s house blackout to reduce electricity consumptions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such country is the United Kingdom, where the main policy response was targeted on existing facilities and was actually driven by European Union post-Fukushima requirements, including a set of nuclear "stress tests", which included considerations of beyond-design-basis accidents. The South Korean government continued to operate its twenty existing nuclear power plants and plans to establish more by 2015 (Song et al, 2013).…”
Section: Social Acceptance Of Nuclear Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%