2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268820001843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk clusters of COVID-19 transmission in northeastern Brazil: prospective space–time modelling

Abstract: This study aimed to analyse the trend and spatial–temporal clusters of risk of transmission of COVID-19 in northeastern Brazil. We conducted an ecological study using spatial and temporal trend analysis. All confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the Northeast region of Brazil were included, from 7 March to 22 May 2020. We used the segmented log-linear regression model to assess time trends, and the local empirical Bayesian estimator, the global and local Moran indexes for spatial analysis. The prospective space–time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
30
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A study in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil by Santos et al [ 44 ] used ArcGIS to determine that city neighborhoods with higher average household density, high tuberculosis incidence, and large older populations (>60 years) were more vulnerable to COVID-19 infections. Gomes et al [ 40 ] used a combination of various spatial statistical techniques in a set of diverse software packages (Joint Point Regression Program for time trend analysis, SaTScan, TerraView, and QGIS) to investigate spatiotemporal clusters of risk transmission of COVID-19 in Brazil. Their results showed higher COVID-19 risk in the northeastern metropolitan areas, as compared to the more rural parts of Brazil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil by Santos et al [ 44 ] used ArcGIS to determine that city neighborhoods with higher average household density, high tuberculosis incidence, and large older populations (>60 years) were more vulnerable to COVID-19 infections. Gomes et al [ 40 ] used a combination of various spatial statistical techniques in a set of diverse software packages (Joint Point Regression Program for time trend analysis, SaTScan, TerraView, and QGIS) to investigate spatiotemporal clusters of risk transmission of COVID-19 in Brazil. Their results showed higher COVID-19 risk in the northeastern metropolitan areas, as compared to the more rural parts of Brazil.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors reported that the interpretation of their findings was limited by ecological fallacy [ 61 ]. Some limitations that were pointed out by researchers included bias of data because of low testing rate and asymptomatic population [ 43 ], underreporting of COVID-19 cases and deaths [ 39 ], and lack of locational data [ 40 ]. Because of such limitations, most of the studies did not explore causal relationships among COVID-19 variables [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tracking system of the nighttime population using mobile phone location data would be helpful for policy decision makers to monitor these dynamics in a real-time manner. Space-time dispersions in transmission of COVID-19 have occurred from metropolitan areas towards the countryside [ 31 ]. Thus, an automated information system to support strategic policy decision making is of particular importance in metropolitan areas with high population density and mobility, where there is an elevated risk of COVID-19 transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the time this manuscript was under review, the COVID-19 epidemic continued to develop, and the predictions of our model were confirmed. A spatial spread of the epidemic was observed in Asia ( 55 , 56 ), Europe ( 57 , 58 ), Africa ( 59 , 60 ), South America ( 61 ), and North America ( 62 65 ). Moreover, as predicted by the model, lifting anti-epidemic measures resulted in a second wave of the epidemic across the world, which we are currently witnessing ( 66 69 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%