Abstract:Results indicate an urgent need for structural interventions designed to reduce the exposure of IDUs, particularly indigenous Australian and Asian injectors, to risk environments. Structural interventions, including population-based hepatitis B immunization, expanded access to needle and syringe programs and drug treatment, prison diversion programs and medically supervised injecting facilities, should be incorporated into existing blood-borne virus prevention efforts.
“…Prevalence estimates from various studies range from 1.8% to 3.0% (Crofts and Aitken 1997, Maher et al 2004, Crofts et al 1994. In one study involving 369 injecting drug users in NSW (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), ten participants (2.7%) tested HBsAg positive indicating current infection.…”
Objective: To examine the chronic hepatitis B (CHB) assessment and management practices of general practitioners in the Sydney and South Western Sydney Local Health Districts, areas with a high prevalence of CHB, and to obtain their views on alternative models of care.
Design, setting and participants: We used a descriptive, cross‐sectional study design to survey GPs who had seen at least one patient aged 18 years or over who had been notified as having CHB to the Public Health Unit between 1 June 2012 and 31 May 2013. There were 213 eligible GPs; the response rate was 57.7%.
Main outcome measures: The CHB assessment, management and referral practices of the GPs, and their opinions about different models of care.
Results: Most GPs (78.9%) were at least reasonably confident about managing CHB. GPs were generally most comfortable with a model of care that involved initial referral to a specialist; managing CHB without specialist input or with only review by a specialised nurse practitioner were less popular.
Conclusion: These results suggest that barriers, including dependence on specialist input, still hinder the appropriate assessment and management of CHB patients by GPs. Well designed and targeted support programs that include specialist support are needed if there is to be a successful shift to an increased role for GPs in the model of care for managing CHB.
“…Prevalence estimates from various studies range from 1.8% to 3.0% (Crofts and Aitken 1997, Maher et al 2004, Crofts et al 1994. In one study involving 369 injecting drug users in NSW (1999)(2000)(2001)(2002), ten participants (2.7%) tested HBsAg positive indicating current infection.…”
Objective: To examine the chronic hepatitis B (CHB) assessment and management practices of general practitioners in the Sydney and South Western Sydney Local Health Districts, areas with a high prevalence of CHB, and to obtain their views on alternative models of care.
Design, setting and participants: We used a descriptive, cross‐sectional study design to survey GPs who had seen at least one patient aged 18 years or over who had been notified as having CHB to the Public Health Unit between 1 June 2012 and 31 May 2013. There were 213 eligible GPs; the response rate was 57.7%.
Main outcome measures: The CHB assessment, management and referral practices of the GPs, and their opinions about different models of care.
Results: Most GPs (78.9%) were at least reasonably confident about managing CHB. GPs were generally most comfortable with a model of care that involved initial referral to a specialist; managing CHB without specialist input or with only review by a specialised nurse practitioner were less popular.
Conclusion: These results suggest that barriers, including dependence on specialist input, still hinder the appropriate assessment and management of CHB patients by GPs. Well designed and targeted support programs that include specialist support are needed if there is to be a successful shift to an increased role for GPs in the model of care for managing CHB.
“…4,5 In contrast, hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence and incidence in various clinic-and community-based IDU populations throughout Australia, mostly in major cities and regional urban centers, have remained high. [6][7][8][9][10] Routine surveillance data have the potential to increase our understanding of HCV transmission trends and consequently inform an improved public health response in the context of a well-established epidemic. To date, there has been limited published data internationally on trends in HCV infection and related risk factors in IDU populations over significant time periods, with studies examining trends in prevalent HCV infection being limited to IDUs recruited via drug treatment facilities 11 or comparison of different data sources over time.…”
High hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence has been documented among many injecting drug user (IDU) populations worldwide; however, there is limited published data on trends in incidence of infection in these epidemics over time. To address this, we used a novel method of analyzing data collected via repeat, cross-sectional sero-surveys by injection initiation cohorts to investigate trends in HCV seropositivity among a population of needle and syringe program (NSP) attendees in Australia between 1995 and 2004, and thereby infer annual incidence trends. Injection initiation cohorts were defined by their time of entry into the IDU population. We also investigated the associations between HCV antibody seroprevalence and risk factor data, and trends in risk factor data over the decade. Approximately 20,000 NSP attendees participated in the study over the 10-year period. Within each injection initiation cohort, we found an increase in HCV prevalence over time, with prevalence appearing to reach saturation around 90%. There was little indication that the slopes of increase had changed with more recent initiation cohorts. While duration of injecting was most strongly associated with HCV seropositivity in this study, we also found that self-reported history of needle and syringe sharing and imprisonment were independently associated with higher HCV prevalence regardless of duration of injecting, with the exception of IDUs who have 15 or more years injecting experience. In this group, recent risk behavior had no relationship to prevalence. In summary, our findings suggest a persistent HCV epidemic despite significant harm reduction efforts in Australia since the mid-1980s, with HIV incidence effectively constant in successive initiation cohorts.
“…Many prison inmates in Australia are serving sentences for drug-related offenses. Having been in prison is an independent risk factor for hepatitis C infection (Maher, Chant, Jalaludin, & Sargent, 2004). The rate of heroin overdose deaths increased 55 fold between 1964 and 1997 (Hall, Degenhardt, & Lynskey, 1999), while the number of opioid overdose deaths is again on the increase from 360 in 2007 to an estimated 712 people in 2010 (Roxburgh & Burns, 2012).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.