2015 IEEE Eindhoven PowerTech 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ptc.2015.7232547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-based voltage stability monitoring and preventive control using wide area monitoring system

Abstract: nowadays, power system tends to be operated in heavily stressed load, which can cause voltage stability problem. Moreover, occurrence probability of contingency is increasing due to growth of power system size and complexity. This paper proposes a new preventive control scheme based on voltage stability and security monitoring by means of wide area monitoring systems (WAMS). The proposed control scheme ensures voltage stability under major N-1 line contingencies, which are selected from all possible N-1 contin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some line contingencies to be considered were selected based on the occurrence probability and the severity of voltage instability as presented in Ref. [16].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some line contingencies to be considered were selected based on the occurrence probability and the severity of voltage instability as presented in Ref. [16].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preventive scheme strategy for securing voltage stability and security considering uncertainty scenario of RES output and line contingency, namely risk‐based optimum power flow (RBOPF), has been proposed in Refs . Consider that the uncertainty in which a scenario power system goes for the upcoming time interval is unknown.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ranks of control variables remain the same among the four control steps. For example, considering the line outage (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), the output power by the generator G37 is the most effective control variable for all the control steps. In contrast, the output power by the generator G30 is the lowest effective control variable for all the control steps.…”
Section: Validation Of the Proposed Sensitivity Methods Upon Differen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the optimal power flow (OPF) into the Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow (SCOPF) problem becoming one of the common solutions for power system operation. Those solution are determining the generator's active power output while selecting some critical contingency [1] which the contingency selected based on, [2], [3], solving SCOPF with the voltage stability constraint for individual contingency scenario [4] and some contingency scenarios simultaneously [5], controlling reactive power of generator or synchronous condenser [6] and in the worst case performing load shedding (LS) in some critical contingencies [7]. However, the computation problem size remains as the major problem since the result of the SCOPF should be available within 15 -30 minutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%