2010 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations 2010
DOI: 10.1109/itng.2010.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-Based Testing: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the time window established and presented in Figure 1, since year 2000 onwards, there is an increasing interest in RBT, with research increasing from 2012 to the present. The percentage of studies according to the classification type per year is: (i) 22.7% corresponding to approaches: 2012 (30) , 2017 (14) , 2018 (22) , 2020 (32,33) ; (ii) 18.2% corresponds to case study: 2000 (21) , 2010 (29) , 2014 (2) , 2016 (12) ; (iii) 9.1% corresponds to Taxonomy: 2014 (9) , 2019 (4) ; (iv) 9.1% corresponds to Techniques: 2005 (26) , 2018 (28) . (v) 40.9% corresponds to one article per year in Framework 2014 (27) , Tools 2007 (31) , Method 2016 (8) , Methodology 2013 (25) , Model 2012 (13) , Prediction of Defects 2016 (23) , Procedure 2014 (7) , Process 2010 (10) and Exploratory Review 2016 (24) .…”
Section: What Studies On Risk-based Testing Exist?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time window established and presented in Figure 1, since year 2000 onwards, there is an increasing interest in RBT, with research increasing from 2012 to the present. The percentage of studies according to the classification type per year is: (i) 22.7% corresponding to approaches: 2012 (30) , 2017 (14) , 2018 (22) , 2020 (32,33) ; (ii) 18.2% corresponds to case study: 2000 (21) , 2010 (29) , 2014 (2) , 2016 (12) ; (iii) 9.1% corresponds to Taxonomy: 2014 (9) , 2019 (4) ; (iv) 9.1% corresponds to Techniques: 2005 (26) , 2018 (28) . (v) 40.9% corresponds to one article per year in Framework 2014 (27) , Tools 2007 (31) , Method 2016 (8) , Methodology 2013 (25) , Model 2012 (13) , Prediction of Defects 2016 (23) , Procedure 2014 (7) , Process 2010 (10) and Exploratory Review 2016 (24) .…”
Section: What Studies On Risk-based Testing Exist?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several risk-based testing approaches have been proposed (Erdogan et al 2014), only a few empirical studies on risk-based testing are available (Yoon and Choi 2011;Souza et al 2010;Felderer and Ramler 2014a, b). Yoon and Choi (2011) propose a test case prioritization strategy for risk-based testing and evaluate its effectiveness on the basis of data from a traffic conflict avoidance system.…”
Section: Risk Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yoon and Choi (2011) propose a test case prioritization strategy for risk-based testing and evaluate its effectiveness on the basis of data from a traffic conflict avoidance system. Souza et al (2010) indicate in a small case study that risk-based testing focuses on the parts of a software that are more likely to fail. The risk-based testing approach is based on their risk-based test process RBTProcess (Souza et al 2009) which consists of the phases risk identification, risk analysis, test planning, test design, test execution, as well as test evaluation and risk control.…”
Section: Risk Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk is measured on the basis of the Factor-Criteria-Metrics model and annotated to UML use case and activity diagrams from which test cases are derived. 05 Souza et al [19,20] The approach defines a risk-based test process including the activities (1) risk identification, (2) risk analysis, (3) test planning, (4) test design, (5) test execution, as well as (6) test evaluation and risk control. In addition, metrics to measure and control RBT activities are given.…”
Section: Risk-based Testing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%