2011
DOI: 10.1002/tal.720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk‐based optimal retrofit of a tall steel building by using friction dampers

Abstract: SUMMARY Friction dampers, whose configuration is optimized on the basis of the probabilistic seismic loss associated with a building's damage due to ground motion, were utilized in this study to optimally retrofit a 15‐story steel structure. In line with the concept of performance‐based earthquake engineering (PBEE), a decision‐making procedure based on the monetary seismic loss was incorporated for optimizing the dampers' configuration. A nonlinear numerical model was initially established for representing th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a number of studies have been conducted on seismic retrofitting methods that can mitigate the disadvantages of the existing seismic retrofitting approaches. The research has focused on seismic retrofitting methods using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) [2,[4][5][6][7][8], steel beams [3,9], and dampers [10][11][12][13][14]. Although new seismic retrofitting methods have been studied to improve the existing retrofitting methods, there are some drawbacks; the drawbacks of the seismic retrofitting method using FRP are the relatively high cost of epoxies, inability to attach on wet surfaces, difficulty conducting post-earthquake assessment of the damage suffered by the reinforced concrete that is behind the undamaged FRP jackets, and so on [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a number of studies have been conducted on seismic retrofitting methods that can mitigate the disadvantages of the existing seismic retrofitting approaches. The research has focused on seismic retrofitting methods using fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) [2,[4][5][6][7][8], steel beams [3,9], and dampers [10][11][12][13][14]. Although new seismic retrofitting methods have been studied to improve the existing retrofitting methods, there are some drawbacks; the drawbacks of the seismic retrofitting method using FRP are the relatively high cost of epoxies, inability to attach on wet surfaces, difficulty conducting post-earthquake assessment of the damage suffered by the reinforced concrete that is behind the undamaged FRP jackets, and so on [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resilience of a building structure can be enhanced by using isolation techniques, supplemental damping systems, or a combination of these . By strategically using these techniques, structural repair and/or replacement of the added devices in the aftermath of an earthquake can be done in a short time.…”
Section: A Typical Thermal Power Plant Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the performance‐based design theory was applied to innovative structural systems like self‐centering moment frame and buildings equipped with damping systems . Tafakori et al performed risk‐based retrofit design on an existing tall steel building. And eight retrofit alternatives were compared in terms of seismic risk and annual loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the influence of important parameters on the maximum displacement of friction damper is also investigated for its effective design in coupling the adjacent structures. In Tafakori et al (2013), friction dampers, whose configuration is optimized on the basis of the probabilistic seismic loss associated with a building's damage due to ground motion, were utilized in this study to optimally retrofit a 15-story steel structure. By monitoring the structural deformations in two different response levels, two patterns were established for the distribution of the dampers' strengths throughout the structure, and a number of retrofit alternatives were proposed subsequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%