2012
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aar120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities

Abstract: We estimate the risk attitudes of a large sample of individuals from various fishing communities along the west coast of South Africa. Female fishers and rights holders are found to be more risk averse than their male counterparts, while rights holders are found to be less risk averse relative to subjects without fishing rights. Risk attitudes are found to be correlated with compliance with fisheries regulations. In particular, a greater degree of risk aversion translates into a reduction in compliance. Furthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
124
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
9
124
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the existing literature that most farmers in developing countries are risk averse (Tanaka et al 2010;Brick et al 2012;Gong et al 2016).…”
Section: Farmers' Risk Preferences Risk Beliefs and Insurance Uptakesupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with the existing literature that most farmers in developing countries are risk averse (Tanaka et al 2010;Brick et al 2012;Gong et al 2016).…”
Section: Farmers' Risk Preferences Risk Beliefs and Insurance Uptakesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For the experiment, this study used a modified multiple price list (MPL) design based on the widely used HoltLaury type measure to elicit farmers' risk preferences (Holt and Laury 2002;Brick et al 2012). The advantage of this MPL design is that it can be explained and implemented with relative ease.…”
Section: Survey and Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies on risk preferences use expected utility theory and implicitly assume that risk aversion comes solely from the concavity of a subject's utility function (Binswanger 1980;Wik et al 2004;Brick, Visser, and Burns 2012;Hardeweg, Menkhoff, and Waibel forthcoming). Tversky and Kahneman's (1979; prospect theory is an expansion of expected utility theory in two ways: (i) the differentiation in the value of gains and losses, and (ii) the weighting of outcome probabilities.…”
Section: Risk Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como advertí en la sección de preferencias temporales, el cuestionario arroja datos censurados y no es posible determinar un coe ciente de aversión al riesgo a nivel individual. Sin embargo, en este estudio estamos interesados en obtener indicadores ordinales que capten las diferencias interpersonales en cuanto a sus preferencias por el riesgo 9 .…”
Section: Aversión Al Riesgounclassified