2022
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2021.3086854
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-Averse Control via CVaR Barrier Functions: Application to Bipedal Robot Locomotion

Abstract: Enforcing safety in the presence of stochastic uncertainty is a challenging problem. Traditionally, researchers have proposed safety in the statistical mean as a safety measure for systems subject to stochastic uncertainty. However, ensuring safety in the statistical mean is only reasonable if system's safe behavior in the large number of runs is of interest, which precludes the use of mean safety in practical scenarios. In this paper, we propose a risk sensitive notion of safety called conditional-value-atris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Value-at-Risk: Value-at-Risk (VaR) is a statistic used quite frequently in the financial literature to determine an individual's exposure to risk [18], [19]. Both VaR and other risk measures have also been used quite frequently in the controls literature to determine safe actions in a worst-case sense [9], [20], [21]. Succinctly though, VaR is defined as follows.…”
Section: A Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Value-at-Risk: Value-at-Risk (VaR) is a statistic used quite frequently in the financial literature to determine an individual's exposure to risk [18], [19]. Both VaR and other risk measures have also been used quite frequently in the controls literature to determine safe actions in a worst-case sense [9], [20], [21]. Succinctly though, VaR is defined as follows.…”
Section: A Preliminaries and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk-aware model predictive control was considered in [29,76], while [17,73] present data-driven and distributionally robust model predictive controllers. Risk-aware control barrier functions for safe control synthesis were proposed in [2], while [58] demonstrates the use of risk in sampling-based planning. We remark that we view these works to be orthogonal to our paper as we provide a data-driven framework for the risk assessment under complex temporal logic specifications, and we hope to inform future control design strategies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 We use the notation 𝔉 (𝐴, 𝐡) to denote the set of all measurable functions mapping from the domain 𝐴 into the domain 𝐡, i.e., an element 𝑓 ∈ 𝔉(𝐴, 𝐡) is a measurable function 𝑓 : 𝐴 β†’ 𝐡. 2 We use the notation βŠ• and βŠ– to denote the Minkowski sum and the Minkowski difference, respectively. where R := R βˆͺ {βˆ’βˆž, ∞} is the set of extended real numbers and where 𝑑 : R 𝑛 Γ— R 𝑛 β†’ R is a metric assigning a distance in R 𝑛 , e.g., the Euclidean norm.…”
Section: Signal Temporal Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Global Position Control: The H-LIP based stepping can also be used for controlling the global position [61] of the underactuated bipedal robot [62], [63] by including the global position in the S2S dynamics. Then the H-LIP stepping can be used to approximately control the global position of the robot, where the feedback is on the error in terms of the global horizontal position, local horizontal position (w.r.t.…”
Section: Extensions and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%