2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment Tools Used to Predict Outcomes of Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) surgical risk calculator 11 was developed in 2013 from >1.4 million cases but fails to provide accurate risk estimations for lower-limb joint replacement 12 . Attempts to make arthroplasty-specific tools have objectively been underpowered and require external validation 13 . By analyzing complication rates over time, we aimed with this study to provide current risk estimations on the basis of a large cohort of patients, to inform recommendations for the care of high-risk groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) surgical risk calculator 11 was developed in 2013 from >1.4 million cases but fails to provide accurate risk estimations for lower-limb joint replacement 12 . Attempts to make arthroplasty-specific tools have objectively been underpowered and require external validation 13 . By analyzing complication rates over time, we aimed with this study to provide current risk estimations on the basis of a large cohort of patients, to inform recommendations for the care of high-risk groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However there are have not a good risk prediction tool has been developed in an attempt to quantify the patient-speci c assessment of risk by Chinese. Numerous clinical tools have been developed to predict a variety of TJA patient outcomes, include "scoring systems, nomograms and algorithms" [15]. The nomogram model is the most effective that can realize the individualized prediction of the risk of adverse clinical events by quantifying, graphing, and visualizing the logistic regression results [16].Another reason we decided to choose the arthro-MAP nomogram to validated is because the 8 preoperative and intraoperative variables (lowest HR, EBL, blood urea nitrogen, procedure type, race, ASA score, comorbidities, and presence of fracture) can be easily get form our hospital and be generalizable widely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria include the following: (1) the patient is undergoing a THA revision, (2) a bilateral THA, or (3) THA following a fractured neck of femur, (4) had a previous THA, (5) unable to converse in written or spoken English, (6) has no access to a Web-based device, and (7) has a risk assessment and prediction tool (RAPT) score less than six. The RAPT uses pre-operative patient factors of age, gender, pre-operative ambulatory distance, use of gait aid, community support, and presence of a home caregiver to predict their need for extended care after a THA [ 13 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%