2011
DOI: 10.5572/ajae.2011.5.2.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Formaldehyde in Korean Public Facilities: Derivation of Health Protection Criteria Levels

Abstract: This study suggests criteria to conduct a risk assessment of VOCs and formaldehyde in uncontrolled public facilities. Pollutants and facilities were selected based on two years of monitoring data and exposure scenarios in 573 uncontrolled public facilities, composed of 10 types of public institutions. With the exception of social welfare facilities, lifetime ECRs of formaldehyde and benzene in each facility were higher in employees than in users, except in social welfare facilities. In social welfare facilitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hazard quotient (HQ) defines the ratio of the exposure concentration for the specific VOC species to an acute reference concentration (RfC) of non-carcinogenic compounds [ 54 , 55 ]. An HQ value of less than 1 indicates a minor or insignificant non-carcinogenic effect, whereas higher values indicate greater non-carcinogenic risks resulting in significant adverse effects on human health [ 56 , 57 , 58 ]. The current study estimated the total HQ values for benzene for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 to be 0.11, 0.43, and 0.09 for males, 0.13, 0.51, and 0.11 for females, and 0.23, 0.85, and 0.19 for children at all industrial sites, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hazard quotient (HQ) defines the ratio of the exposure concentration for the specific VOC species to an acute reference concentration (RfC) of non-carcinogenic compounds [ 54 , 55 ]. An HQ value of less than 1 indicates a minor or insignificant non-carcinogenic effect, whereas higher values indicate greater non-carcinogenic risks resulting in significant adverse effects on human health [ 56 , 57 , 58 ]. The current study estimated the total HQ values for benzene for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 to be 0.11, 0.43, and 0.09 for males, 0.13, 0.51, and 0.11 for females, and 0.23, 0.85, and 0.19 for children at all industrial sites, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to relevant interviews and investigations, TVOC and formaldehyde concentrations were chosen as the evaluation indices of indoor environmental quality, and a rough classification evaluation scheme, combining air quality and pollution control, was put forward (Table 8). With a formaldehyde concentration of 0.05 mg·m −3 , human brain waves begin to appear abnormal; at 0.10 mg·m −3 , the national standard value, the body begins to perceive the smell and feel uncomfortable; at 0.20 mg·m −3 , the body begins to produce strong olfactory stimuli, and the eyes, nose, throat and upper respiratory tract are heavily irritated [40].…”
Section: Discussion On Evaluation Methods Of Indoor Pollutants Classifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the uncertainty constant of the toxicity data, the respiratory exposure reference value and the RfC value as high as 0.4 mg/m 3 were applied. In addition, RfC values of ethylbenzene, xylene, and styrene were referred to from Hardin et al (1981), Korsak et al (1994), Kim et al (2011), Mutti et al (1984, and Neubert et al (2001) (Tables 2). Assuming that the occupants would be exposed to polluted indoor air of a random concentration during the entire life, the exposure rate to a human body can be calculated with reference to the pollutant concentration, inhalation rate per day, body weight, exposure frequency, exposure duration, expected lifetime, etc.…”
Section: Human Exposure and Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%