Risk assessment of sensory irritants in indoor air—a case study in a French school

Abstract

Exposure to airborne pollutants can result in adverse health effects. Acute symptoms can for instance comprise of irritation of the eyes or of the respiratory tract (called sensory irritation). In a recent case, health problems were reported in a French school and supposedly attributed to the presence of airborne irritant pollutants. Based on measured concentrations, the risk of developing the described health effects was assessed.Numerous airborne sensory irritants (aldehydes, organic acids, VOCs, SO 2 , NH 3 ) were identified and quantified in the indoor air by using active and passive sampling and online monitoring techniques. Reference values based on toxicological properties of compounds (sensory irritants) were taken from the literature. If not available, tentative values were specially developed for this purpose. Concentrations of all sensory irritants remain below their corresponding guideline values and are comparable to literature data. It was concluded that the risk of developing sensory irritation due to the presence of the studied compounds is negligible. This holds both for individual compounds and for the mixture of studied compounds. Limitations of the employed sampling strategy, and of existing sampling and analytical techniques, which do not allow for analysing more reactive compounds -which are strong sensory irritants -may play a role. New sampling techniques need to be developed. Psychosocial factors (group behaviour, increased attention to sensory irritation) should also be taken into account when dealing with health complaints on sensory irritation.

Indoor air quality differences between urban and rural preschools in Korea

“…The most frequent symptoms listed on the questionnaires were related to respiratory problems such as flu, bronchitis, rhinitis, tonsillitis, irritation of throat, nose, and epidemic conjunctivitis. All of these symptoms are known to be related to IAQ (Meininghaus et al 2003). Some published data on the level of indoor and outdoor pollutants in Korea were similar to this study (Baek et al 1997;Jo et al 2003) while others are somewhat higher (Bae et al 2004;Son et al 2003) depending on the sampling protocol, local area and year.…”

Identifying an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde considering both irritation and cancer hazards

“…In another study by Meininghaus et al (2003), sensory irritation was reported in school children. The airborne levels of several respiratory irritants were measured (e.g., SO 2 , ammonia, acetic acid, formic acid, hexanal, butanal, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde).…”

Characterization of indoor air quality in primary schools in Antwerp, Belgium

“…Other studies focussed on the relation between pollution and health outcomes. Meininghaus et al. (2003) organized a study aimed at identifying compounds (aldehydes, organic acids, volatile organic compounds, SO 2 and NH 3 ), which could be responsible for the reported adverse health effects, but no cause could be identified.…”