2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of main control board fire using fire dynamics simulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed methodology aims to offer a standardized approach for PRA (Port Risk Assessment) based on empirical study utilizing the historical record of encountered accidents with regard to their frequency of occurrence and their impact upon the human and environmental resources of the port [6]. To evaluate risk, Kang et al [7] proposed a fire dynamics simulator and a decision tree to systematically determine the main control board fire. Hsieh et al [8] proposed an assessment framework which helps decision-makers understand the interdependent vulnerabilities and their impact on critical infrastructure like commercial port, and the authors adopt the appropriate strategies for the mitigation of losses, and preparedness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed methodology aims to offer a standardized approach for PRA (Port Risk Assessment) based on empirical study utilizing the historical record of encountered accidents with regard to their frequency of occurrence and their impact upon the human and environmental resources of the port [6]. To evaluate risk, Kang et al [7] proposed a fire dynamics simulator and a decision tree to systematically determine the main control board fire. Hsieh et al [8] proposed an assessment framework which helps decision-makers understand the interdependent vulnerabilities and their impact on critical infrastructure like commercial port, and the authors adopt the appropriate strategies for the mitigation of losses, and preparedness.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 6) Stacking limited to 3 levels for containers of dangerous products and location of containers at the end of the blocks. (7) Compliance with traffic rules on platforms and solid land; container storage mode, floor marking, definition of traffic direction.…”
Section: Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al (2013) used FDS to analyze the main feature of fire smoke on human body injury and discussed the impact of smoke and temperature change in the train personnel in emergency evacuation [20]. Kang et al (2015) adopted FDS to make a risk management of main control board and estimate the time for main control board abandonment [21]. Additionally, Oliveira et al (2019) evaluated how the FDS correlated with experimental fire heights and temperature profiles around a small-scale pool fire and finally provided detailed temperature field around the height of the fire [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%