2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of exposure to volatile organic compounds in groundwater in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Squillace et al (2002) reported that three of 1,228 domestic wells had tetrachloroethylene, with a concentration exceeding the MCL of the USA (5 μg/L). Fan et al (2009) reported that the concentration of tetrachloroethylene in Taiwan's groundwater ranged from non-detectable to 21 μg/L.…”
Section: Voc Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squillace et al (2002) reported that three of 1,228 domestic wells had tetrachloroethylene, with a concentration exceeding the MCL of the USA (5 μg/L). Fan et al (2009) reported that the concentration of tetrachloroethylene in Taiwan's groundwater ranged from non-detectable to 21 μg/L.…”
Section: Voc Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some risk is assumed for carcinogens, regardless of dosage [30][31][32]. Concentrations of gaseous contaminants are measured routinely in many countries, usually in response to concerns about potential effects on human health [33][34][35][36][37][38]. However, their risk assessment for public health has not yet become a routine task with respect to MSW landfills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details of MEPAS and MMSOILS and their application can be found elsewhere [7,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Model Description and Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in environmental practice have utilized either a simple single-medium model using deterministic calculation or a comprehensive stochastic multimedia model considering sitespecificity [4,5]. The multimedia risk assessment model has become increasingly popular over the past few years due to its wide applicability and consideration of multiple contaminants and contact media [6][7][8][9]. However, the risks calculated from different multimedia risk assessment models may still vary due to the use of different conceptual algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%