Risk Assessment of E. coli Survival Up to the Grazing Exclusion Period After Dairy Slurry, Cattle Dung, and Biosolids Application to Grassland

Abstract

Grassland application of dairy slurry, cattle dung, and biosolids offers an opportunity to recycle valuable nutrients (N, P, and K), which may all introduce pathogens to the soil environment. Herein, a temporal risk assessment of the survival of Escherichia coli (E. coli) up to 40 days in line with the legislated grazing exclusion time points after application was examined across six scenarios: (1) soil and biosolids mixture, (2) biosolids amended soil, (3) dairy slurry application, (4) cattle dung on pasture, (5) comparison of scenario 2, 3, and 4, and (6) maximum legal vs. excess rate of application for scenario 2 and 3. The risk model input parameters were taken or derived from regressions within the literature and an uncertainty analysis (n = 1,000 trials for each scenario) was conducted. Scenario 1 results showed that E. coli survival was higher in the soil/biosolids mixture for higher biosolids portion, resulting in the highest 20 day value of residual E. coli concentration (i.e., C 20 , log 10 CFU g −1 dw) of 1.0 in 100% biosolids or inoculated soil and the lowest C 20 of 0.098 in 75/25 soil/biosolids ratio, respectively, in comparison to an average initial value of ∼6.4 log 10 CFU g −1 dw. The E. coli survival across scenario 2, 3, and 4 showed that the C 20 value of biosolids (0.57 log 10 CFU g −1 dw) and dairy slurry (0.74 log 10 CFU ml −1) was 2.9-3.7 times smaller than that of cattle dung (2.12 log 10 CFU g −1 dw). The C 20 values of biosolids and dairy slurry associated with legal and excess application rates ranged from 1.14 to 1.71 log 10 CFU ha −1 , which is a significant reduction from the initial concentration range (12.99 to 14.83 log 10 CFU ha −1). The E. coli survival in un-amended soil was linear with a very low decay rate resulting in a higher C 20 value than that of biosolids or dairy slurry. The risk assessment and uncertainly analysis showed that the residual concentrations in biosolids/dairy slurry applied soil after 20 days would be 45-57% lower than that of the background soil E. coli concentration. This means the current practice of grazing exclusion times is safe to reduce the risk of E. coli transmission into the soil environment.

Viability of enterobacteria in swine manure storage units

“…These criteria are essential for the reduction of enteropathogenic microorganisms in animal manure, aiming to minimize the risk of diseases caused by the contamination during production of vegetables and fruits destined for human consumption in natura (Venglovsky et al, 2018). Therefore, the policies for the use and consumption of a certain product after the application of waste must be carefully followed (Ashekuzzaman et al, 2018).…”

A Fuzzy Cognitive Map method for integrated and participatory water governance and indicators affecting drinking water supplies

“…The characterization of water abstraction and contamination due to point and diffuse losses of nutrients (e.g. nitrogen and phosphorus, Fenton et al, 2017), pesticides (Morton et al, 2019), pathogens (Ashekuzzaman et al, 2018) and emerging contaminants such as micro-plastics and pharmaceuticals (Lou et al, 2014;Naidu et al, 2016;Machado et al, 2016;Lai et al, 2018) in areas with connectivity to drinking water supplies are subjects of on-going research (McGrory et al, 2017;Khan et al, 2018;Schutz et al, 2019;Panikkar et al, 2019;Jaramillo and O'Shea, 2019). Indeed, research into the provision and implementation of "best management practices" on agricultural landscapes to protect drinking water supplies is an important area of research.…”