2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in food – Comments by the German Federal Environmental Agency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies found that postnatal exposure to dioxins affects thyroid hormone system and immunological functions of infants and children (69,70). Moreover, it should be noted that infants and children absorb dioxins at a faster rate than adults due to their high growth rate (71). In addition, TZ infants are at greater risk due to higher background levels, implying that they would absorb more dioxins via dermal contact, inhalation, and prenatal exposure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies found that postnatal exposure to dioxins affects thyroid hormone system and immunological functions of infants and children (69,70). Moreover, it should be noted that infants and children absorb dioxins at a faster rate than adults due to their high growth rate (71). In addition, TZ infants are at greater risk due to higher background levels, implying that they would absorb more dioxins via dermal contact, inhalation, and prenatal exposure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-occupational routes of exposure to the PCDDs include inhalation of contaminated air, ingestion of contaminated substances, and dermal contact. The major route (>90%) of exposure is from dietary ingestion of contaminated foods (IARC, 1997) and there is particular concern for breast-fed infants (Gies et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is remarkable considering the standard guidance for safety factors (ECETOC 1995;ATSDR 1998) and the evidence on variation in susceptibility (Masten et al 1998) and vulnerability (Wallin et al 2003) also in humans. The decision of SCF (2001) a safety factor based on inter-individual variation (SCF 2000) was criticized by UBA (Gies et al 2007, Table 1). Many arguments concerning safety factors are related to fundamental epistemic and policy principles, i.e.…”
Section: Tolerable Daily Intakesmentioning
confidence: 99%