2015
DOI: 10.3390/toxins7124873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment of Deoxynivalenol by Revisiting Its Bioavailability in Pig and Rat Models to Establish Which Is More Suitable

Abstract: Due to its toxic properties, high stability, and prevalence, the presence of deoxynivalenol (DON) in the food chain is a major threat to food safety and therefore a health risk for both humans and animals. In this study, experiments were carried out with sows and female rats to examine the kinetics of DON after intravenous and oral administration at 100 µg/kg of body weight. After intravenous administration of DON in pigs, a two-compartment model with rapid initial distribution (0.030 ± 0.019 h) followed by a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a) Swine DON, (Saint-Cyr et al, 2015) b) Swine DON, (Paulick et al, 2015) c) Chicken DON, d) Chicken ZEN, (Buranatragool et al, 2015) e) Chicken T2, (Sun et al, 2015) f) Chicken NIV, (Kongkapan et al, 2015) g) Chicken ENNB ENNB1 (Fraeyman et al, 2016) -PIGS + DON All the chemical properties of mycotoxins for internal dose modelling were recovered and are available online on the MYCHIF repository and EFSA knowledge junction (10.5281/zenodo.3615174).…”
Section: Toxicokinetics (In Vivo) Database: Internal Dose Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…a) Swine DON, (Saint-Cyr et al, 2015) b) Swine DON, (Paulick et al, 2015) c) Chicken DON, d) Chicken ZEN, (Buranatragool et al, 2015) e) Chicken T2, (Sun et al, 2015) f) Chicken NIV, (Kongkapan et al, 2015) g) Chicken ENNB ENNB1 (Fraeyman et al, 2016) -PIGS + DON All the chemical properties of mycotoxins for internal dose modelling were recovered and are available online on the MYCHIF repository and EFSA knowledge junction (10.5281/zenodo.3615174).…”
Section: Toxicokinetics (In Vivo) Database: Internal Dose Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicokinetic model 1-cmpt, output and comparison with data reported by (Saint-Cyr et al, 2015) DON-swine oral administration.Data reported by(Saint-Cyr et al, 2015) are used for model initialization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42.5 µg/kg bw/day). Calculating with the average feed intake of 30 g/animal/day and the absorption ratio of the toxins as 3.5% (Martinez-Larranaga et al, 1999), 47% (Saint-Cyr et al, 2015) and 28% (Mallis, Sarkahian, Harris, Zhang, & McConnell, 2003), respectively, the intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration represented the following dietary exposures: approximately.…”
Section: Animals and Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pigs, both ADONs are completely absorbed following oral administration, while the oral bioavailability of DON and acetylated derivatives is rather low in broiler chickens (Broekaert et al 2015b). For DON, it has been demonstrated multiple factors might influence the oral bioavailability of DON such as the prandial state (fed versus fasted), the administration of a bolus versus the administration of contaminated feed, feed composition, and breed (Broekaert et al 2015b;Eriksen and Pettersson 2004;Goyarts and Dänicke 2006;Prelusky et al 1988;Saint-Cyr et al 2015). Taking into account the substantial to complete presystemic hydrolysis of both ADONs, in broiler chickens and pigs, these acetylated forms can be regarded as potent as DON itself with regard to systemic toxicity (Broekaert et al 2015b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%