2017
DOI: 10.1177/2050640617731262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its management options

Abstract: The prognostic index has good diagnostic accuracy but dividing patients into two risk groups is insufficient. The suggested model allows determining an intermediate-risk group, which requires additional investigation. Both management approaches are appropriate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Prasiplėtęs BTL ir echoskopiškai jame matomi hiperechogeniniai dariniai keleto studijų apibūdinami kaip stipriausi TLA prediktoriai [19,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Echoskopijaunclassified
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Prasiplėtęs BTL ir echoskopiškai jame matomi hiperechogeniniai dariniai keleto studijų apibūdinami kaip stipriausi TLA prediktoriai [19,[24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Echoskopijaunclassified
“…Septynių ASGE sistemą vertinančių studijų analizė parodė, kad suminės predikcinės didelės TLA rizikos vertės tėra patenkinamos: bendras jautrumas buvo 52,4 proc., specifiškumas -60,8 proc., teigiama prognostinė vertė -65,6 proc., neigiama prognostinė vertė -47,4 proc., tikslumas -55,9 proc. [24]. Perspektyviojo vertinimo rezultatai parodė, kad minėtų gairių naudojimas klinikinėje praktikoje gali lemti 20-30 proc.…”
Section: Tla Rizikos Vertinimo Sistemosunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sample size was calculated in reference to collected data on management of choledocholithiasis in the trial centre, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos (11). In our previous study mean treatment duration for different management strategy groups (LC-IOC first and ERCP-first) were 5.37 and 7.13 days, with standard deviations 2.5 and 2.8 respectively, these findings were used to calculate requested sample size.…”
Section: Statistical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%