2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-023-10949-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of available and total heavy metals contents in various land use in calcareous soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…n is the number of different heavy metal species at the sampling site. T i r represents the heavy metal toxicity response value, which was as follows in descending order: Hg (40), Cd (30), As (10), Cr (5), Ni (5), Pb (5), Cu (2), and Zn (1) [52]. The classifications of E i r and I RI are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Potential Ecological Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…n is the number of different heavy metal species at the sampling site. T i r represents the heavy metal toxicity response value, which was as follows in descending order: Hg (40), Cd (30), As (10), Cr (5), Ni (5), Pb (5), Cu (2), and Zn (1) [52]. The classifications of E i r and I RI are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Potential Ecological Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, anthropogenic inputs and natural sources are significant sources of soil heavy metals [9]. The geological input of soil heavy metals is one of the weathering products from the bedrock in the soil formation process [10]. For example, the distribution area of black shale in southwest China is abundant in metal sulfide minerals, which are easily oxidized and weathered upon exposure to the ground, resulting in elevated levels of heavy metals in the surrounding area [9,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%