2002
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment of an interacting structure–soil system due to liquefaction

Abstract: SUMMARYThe present study deals with the non-linear stochastic dynamic analysis of a soil-structure interacting system. The ultimate objective is to determine the risk of damage to the system due to liquefaction under a wide range of earthquake intensities. A Monte Carlo simulation approach is followed in conjunction with advanced ÿnite element procedures. The stochastic spatial variability of soil properties and the randomness of the seismic excitation are taken into account in order to estimate the statistics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 to 10m) with a max bed greater than 0.12g (Figure 8 d). These conclusions agree with those found by Koutsourelakis et al [19] and Popescu [20].…”
Section: Liquefaction Analysessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 to 10m) with a max bed greater than 0.12g (Figure 8 d). These conclusions agree with those found by Koutsourelakis et al [19] and Popescu [20].…”
Section: Liquefaction Analysessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This phenomenon of SSI added to the foundation type [32] can explain the response of collapsed structures observed during the recent earthquakes, as it is reported by Tokimatsu et al [28] and Juang et al [31] among others. A similar response has been reported in numerical and physical tests [37,38,19,26,35,36].…”
Section: Effects Of Liquefaction In Modifying Seismic Ssisupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of such a structure is governed by the observation that the building height is not critical in assessing building response due to ground failure, observation which has been confirmed analytically by Koutsourelakis et al (2002).…”
Section: Rc Frame Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On peut remarquer que le spectre de réponse médian est compatible avec le spectre de réponse du sol type A de l'Eurocode8 ajusté à la valeur médiane de l'accélération maximale en rocher affleu rant. Les statistiques sur quelques caractéristiques des signaux d'entrée sont résumées dans le tableau I. Ces caractéristiques sismiques sont l'accélération maximale au rocher affleurant (PHA), l'intensité d'Arias (IA rias), la période prédominante (Tp), la période moyenne (Tm) (Rathje et al, 1998), l'intensité spectrale (Si), la vitesse maximale (pgv), l'intensité mis (Irm s) (Koutsourelakis et al, 2002), la densité d'énergie spécifique (SED) et la durée significative (t5 95). Pour les définitions des para mètres voir l'annexe A.…”
Section: Signaux Sismiques D'entréeunclassified