2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11195388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment of Additional Works in Railway Construction Investments Using the Bayes Network

Abstract: The implementation of railway infrastructure construction projects including sustainable development goals is a complex process characterized by a significant extension of individual investment stages. The need for additional works has a big impact on construction railway projects, representing a risk which is the result of many different factors. During the execution of works, both the design assumptions and the conditions of the project’s implementation can be changed. An attempt to eliminate potential risks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1975, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) developed and established the famous probabilistic risk assessment method, which became a milestone in the history of engineering risk analysis. Misra et al proposed a fuzzy fault tree analysis method, which was applied in safety risk assessment [16]; Dunyak et al established a reliable fuzzy model by introducing the expansion theory, which can effectively deal with the fuzziness of the risk of each bottom event in the fault tree [17]; Roberts proposed the integrated quantitative risk management theory and established the decision support theory after risk analysis, arranging and screening [18]; Fung et al created a risk assessment model, which can help identify and predict the risk levels [19]; Leu et al built a safety risk assessment model based on improved Bayesian network (BN) of fault tree (FT) [20]; Gamble et al established the fuzzy and grey correlation analysis model and evaluated duration risk, cost risk, quality risk and safety risk separately [21]; Aminbakhsh et al presented a safety risk assessment framework, which can give priority to the security risk of the project before making a reasonable budget [22]; Tian proposed a grey hierarchy evaluation model, which can assign the importance priority sequence of safety management measures [23]; Zhao et al proposed a a hybrid risk evaluation model based on the cloud model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [24]; Esmaeili et al presented an attribute-based risk identification and analysis method [25,26]; Ning et al established a safety risk assessment model to carry out site layout and safety management [27]; Huang et al proposed an improved AHP-Grey model of construction safety evaluation, this model can better reflect the actual safety situation of construction [28]; Gebrehiwet et al proposed an integrated model of the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) [29]; Leśniak et al presented a method for creating risk management strategies using a standard algorithm that includes risk identification, risk analysis, and risk assessment [30]; Dong et al proposed the Pb-Zn mine safety risk evaluation model based on the fuzzy-grey correlation analysis method [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1975, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) developed and established the famous probabilistic risk assessment method, which became a milestone in the history of engineering risk analysis. Misra et al proposed a fuzzy fault tree analysis method, which was applied in safety risk assessment [16]; Dunyak et al established a reliable fuzzy model by introducing the expansion theory, which can effectively deal with the fuzziness of the risk of each bottom event in the fault tree [17]; Roberts proposed the integrated quantitative risk management theory and established the decision support theory after risk analysis, arranging and screening [18]; Fung et al created a risk assessment model, which can help identify and predict the risk levels [19]; Leu et al built a safety risk assessment model based on improved Bayesian network (BN) of fault tree (FT) [20]; Gamble et al established the fuzzy and grey correlation analysis model and evaluated duration risk, cost risk, quality risk and safety risk separately [21]; Aminbakhsh et al presented a safety risk assessment framework, which can give priority to the security risk of the project before making a reasonable budget [22]; Tian proposed a grey hierarchy evaluation model, which can assign the importance priority sequence of safety management measures [23]; Zhao et al proposed a a hybrid risk evaluation model based on the cloud model and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [24]; Esmaeili et al presented an attribute-based risk identification and analysis method [25,26]; Ning et al established a safety risk assessment model to carry out site layout and safety management [27]; Huang et al proposed an improved AHP-Grey model of construction safety evaluation, this model can better reflect the actual safety situation of construction [28]; Gebrehiwet et al proposed an integrated model of the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) [29]; Leśniak et al presented a method for creating risk management strategies using a standard algorithm that includes risk identification, risk analysis, and risk assessment [30]; Dong et al proposed the Pb-Zn mine safety risk evaluation model based on the fuzzy-grey correlation analysis method [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the methods using BN to research in the field of engineering of construction projects is the proprietary method of managing the risk of additional works in railway projects, presented in [16]. The Netica program was used to build the model [11], however the HUGIN program was used in the present work [10].…”
Section: Authors' Example -A Proposal To Use Bayes Network To Analyzementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of new technologies is visible in contemporary works, including the implementation of BIM standards in the construction investment process [27], or the use of information from the "Big Data" [6]. The authors of many papers describe the implementation of the results of their research to the construction industry [9,18,19,24], cost of construction works [13,17,21,25], risk in construction [15,16,23]. One example combining the practical aspect and high research potential are the Bayesian Networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] and ISO standard [11] state that in some publications the terms risk and uncertainty are treated identically or interchangeably, which is a mistake. According to Knight [28] and ISO standard [11], risk is related to the so-called measurable uncertainty.…”
Section: Reasons For Choosing Theory Of Possibility To Build the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%