2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470284704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
339
0
22

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 639 publications
(364 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
339
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…This random field generator requires the mean values, standard deviation and correlation length as inputs. An in detail explanation of the local average subdivision method can be found in reference [10]. The realisations produced with this random field generator were used as an input in the finite element software ParaFEM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This random field generator requires the mean values, standard deviation and correlation length as inputs. An in detail explanation of the local average subdivision method can be found in reference [10]. The realisations produced with this random field generator were used as an input in the finite element software ParaFEM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of some realisations are shown in Figure 10. This random field generator is a modified version of the Local Average Subdivision method [10]. In this random field the intact material is assigned with a given material property value and the porous material property value are 100 times smaller than the value for intact material.…”
Section: Porosity Random Field Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hicks and Samy 2002;Fenton and Griffiths 2008). Additionally, soil failures often involve large deformations which are typically unsuitable for simulations using static mesh-based methods such as the finite element method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed comparison between numerical and analytical approaches was recently made for long slopes characterised by spatially variable undrained shear strength (Li et al, 2015). This involved the random finite element method (RFEM) (Fenton & Griffiths, 2008) and a simpler approach developed by Vanmarcke (1977), based on idealising the failure mechanism as a cylindrical surface with additional resistance at both ends. This was later extended (Vanmarcke, 1980) to general drained and undrained cases, for spatially variable C-ϕ soils governed by the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%