Risk assessment as a tool for improving external biosecurity at farm level

Abstract

BackgroundBiosecurity routines at herd level may reduce the probability of introduction of disease into the herd, but some measures may be regarded as expensive and cumbersome for the farmers. Custom-made measures based on individual farm characteristics may aid in improving the actual application of on-farm biosecurity.The aim of the study was to provide a tool for calculating the effects of different biosecurity measures and strategies on the individual farm level.A simple model was developed to assess the risk of disease introduction and the need for biosecurity measures in individual farms. To illustrate the general applicability of the tool, it was applied to theoretical examples of Swedish cattle and pig farms and diseases endemic in those animal species in the EU, in two scenarios with different between-farm contact patterns.ResultsThe model illustrated that the most important factors affecting the risk, and the effect of biosecurity measures such as quarantine routines and protective clothing, were the frequency of between-farm contacts and prevalence of the disease. The risk of introduction as well as the effect of biosecurity measures differed between farm types and disease transmission routes. Adapting contact patterns to mitigate a specific disease risk was as important as biosecurity measures for some farm types, but the largest effect was seen when combining biosecurity measures with more planned contact patterns.ConclusionsThe risk assessment model proved useful for illustrating the risk of introduction of endemic diseases and the mitigating effect of different biosecurity measures on farm level. Model outputs could be used to justify prioritisation of measures or adapting contact patterns. The theoretic exercise of adjusting model inputs and comparing outputs may help veterinary advisors to understand farm-specific risks and motivate farmers to improve biosecurity in their individual farm, as it can be tailored to each farmer’s needs and preferences.

Effects of financial incentives and cessation of thinning on prevalence of Campylobacter: a longitudinal monitoring study on commercial broiler farms in the UK

“…15 However, in most instances, biosecurity can be enhanced on conventional broiler farms, which should contribute to reduced colonisation, but complementary, non-biosecurity-based interventions are also required to enhance Campylobacter control at farm level. 16 The dissemination of biosecurity policies to farmers must be accompanied by good compliance with these procedures in the ield, 17 but it is oten diicult to sustain high standards over long periods of time. 18 Audits and surveillance cameras were insuicient to ensure long-term compliance with protocols 19 ; personality traits, education, knowledge and experience may be more important factors in biosecurity compliance.…”

Risk management strategies adopted by small-scale vegetable farmers in Thaba Chweu Local Municipality, Mpumalanga Province in South Africa

“…Knutson et al (2011) andWoods et al (2017) also shared similar findings, establishing that a farmer's level of adoption of risk management strategies and successful risk management is affected by certain factors which include the absence of transparent information, limited institutional support and lack of capital. To this point, given the study results, and a proposition by Duong et al (2019), improved institutional support for risk management is therefore essential so as to understand the farmers' risk perceptions, the socioeconomic factors that influence risk perceptions and the likely response to risks, and the barriers to implementing risk management strategies (Lewerin et al, 2015). Figure 2 indicates the number of farmers who adopt risk management strategies and those who do not use any risk management strategy.…”

Modelling of Livestock Systems to Enhance Efficiency

“…The same authors noted that these quantitative models could not be developed easily because of the lack of relevant long-term data. Moreover, according to Sternberg-Lewerin et al (2015), it is difficult to obtain quantitative data from field studies. In contrast, the role of people in disease transmission has been carefully studied over the last decade.…”