Risk Assessment Approaches for Carcinogenic Food Contaminants

Abstract

Health Canada has identified the need for a standardized department-wide approach for the risk assessment of carcinogens in foods (e.g., pesticides, food chemical contaminants, veterinary therapeutics). A standardized approach would better facilitate and inform risk management strategies for the control of human exposure to food sources of carcinogens. Within the postmarket regulatory context, directly DNA-reactive carcinogens are of most concern because any exposure is theoretically assumed to be associated with a risk of producing a carcinogenic effect in proportion to the dose. Such non-threshold carcinogens, as well as carcinogens in which a non-linear dose response has not been demonstrated, require different approaches for risk characterization. In order to contribute to Health Canada's department-wide discussions regarding the development of risk management strategies for carcinogens, a general overview was conducted on international approaches for post-market risk assessments of carcinogenic contaminants in food. In this review, areas in the risk assessment paradigm which are identified for development of further standardized guidance include the weight-of-evidence determination for whether a compound should be considered a non-threshold carcinogen, the technical criteria for choosing the appropriate dose-response assessment approach, and a consistent approach for interpreting and prioritizing risk.

Evaluation of carcinogenic risks related to nitrate exposure in drinking water in Iran

“…(1), and CPFhuman is human cancer potency factor ((dose unit/day) −1 ). It is the additional cancer risk related to one daily dose unit of a specified nitrosamine (1.04 × 10 −2 (μg/kg bw/day) −1 ) [9].…”

An Introduction to the Challenges for Risk Assessment of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

“…With a margin of error, a no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) can then be estimated. As with some genotoxic carcinogens [5][6][7][8], EDCs may not always have a threshold value for adverse effects [9].…”

Identification and Evaluation of Potentially Genotoxic Agricultural and Food-related Chemicals

“…As mentioned in the former section, there is already substantial evidence to demonstrate practical thresholds for at least some directly DNA-reactive mutagens 26,27) . We think it is possible to assess such mutagens in the same way as other toxicological effects that exhibit thresholds 28,29) , by determining a virtually safe dose (VSD), ensuring levels As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) in most cases, and/or establishing appropriate TTCs.…”