2018
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1471579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk assessment and prevention of surface subsidence in deep multiple coal seam mining under dense above-ground buildings: Case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They presented an approach to building damage risk assessment in mining induced areas, which is based on a comparison between buildings strength and terrain deformation. In another work [53], the authors proposed an integrated system comprising deep mining, coal-gangue dressing, and underground backfill mining. They also developed many numerical models for buildings aimed at studying the surface subsidence and deformation.…”
Section: Thematic Analysis Of the Conducted Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They presented an approach to building damage risk assessment in mining induced areas, which is based on a comparison between buildings strength and terrain deformation. In another work [53], the authors proposed an integrated system comprising deep mining, coal-gangue dressing, and underground backfill mining. They also developed many numerical models for buildings aimed at studying the surface subsidence and deformation.…”
Section: Thematic Analysis Of the Conducted Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the SWBM technique, the key to decreasing overlying strata movement and surface subsidence is to control the effective thickness of the backfill materials after being compacted under the load of the overlying strata. After being filled into goaf, the backfill materials serve as the main support and bear most of the load imposed by the overlying strata so they are compacted [26][27], which is equivalent to lowering the mining height. Therefore, an equivalent mining height (EMH) theory [23] was presented to study the pattern of SWBM-induced surface subsidence.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Strata Movement and Surface Subsidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many scholars have researched the aforementioned problems. Miao Xiexing [8~10] , Zhang Jixiong [11][12][13] , and Zhang Qiang [14,15] have advanced the equivalent mining height theory, key layer control theory, main roof control theory, and immediate roof control theory. These studies concluded that solid back ll mining can be regarded as extremely thin coal seam mining, allowing the surface subsidence to be controlled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%